Dogberry2 wrote:
> Copyright law is a morass of contradictions, inconsistencies,
> inequities, and foolishness, to which no one can rightly claim full
> understanding. Even so-called specialists in copyright law are often
> confused and uncertain about what they can, and cannot, make stand up in
Copyright law is a morass of contradictions, inconsistencies,
inequities, and foolishness, to which no one can rightly claim full
understanding. Even so-called specialists in copyright law are often
confused and uncertain about what they can, and cannot, make stand up in
court. That's why so many
The (correct) statement was qualified, cites a reference and postscripts
the whole thing with a massive winking smiley. I hope most people didn't
take it too seriously.
Sent from my Nexus 9 using Tapatalk
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS
drmatt wrote:
> Fortunately the context for the statement that preceded it was "here in
> the UK".. so in fact it's true.
>
Actually, the "everyone on this forum" implies reach way beyond the UK
reference. It's why I said you need to be more careful making such
strong assertions; people read
No the digital copy of a mp3 file is illegal too. Because it is digital
it is the same as the original. It is legal to make an analog copy of
the mp3 file.
I think this whole discussion is as meaningless as "what's the maximum
speed you are allowed to drive?". It depends on your country. Laws
w3wilkes wrote:
> Since mp3 is not an exact copy would it be considered the same as a tape
> recorder?
No the digital copy of a mp3 file is illegal too. Because it is digital
it is the same as the original. It is legal to make an analog copy of
the mp3 file.
Callesoroe
Living room:
In opposite to downloading, recording music in the background is not
illegal, provided that you will not publish the results.
More precisely, you are moving in a grey area.
I recommend audials tunebite premium:
http://audials.com/en/how_to_record_internet_radios/spotify.html
You have to spend
RonM wrote:
> You need to be a bit more careful about such assertive, and wrong,
> statements.
Fortunately the context for the statement that preceded it was "here in
the UK".. so in fact it's true.
Anyway, the whole area is an international joke. People have been and
will continue to format
drmatt wrote:
>
> Format shifting is still explicitly illegal. So everyone on this forum
> listening to ripped CDs is committing an offence. [emoji12]
>
You need to be a bit more careful about such assertive, and wrong,
statements.
In Canada, format shifting is EXPLICITLY allowed, provided
callesoroe wrote:
> In Denmark it is illegal to make a digital copy because the quality is
> identical. If you use a taperecorder, you will not have a exact copy.
>
Since mp3 is not an exact copy would it be considered the same as a tape
recorder?
2 Duets - 1 for upstairs and 1 for
Mnyb wrote:
> Is that any legal difference between a software and a good old fashioned
> tape recorder ?
In Denmark it is illegal to make a digital copy because the quality is
identical. If you use a taperecorder, you will not have a exact copy.
It is legal to make a copy of your own CD's and
And why start several treads on this very topic ( never seen the op in
any other kind of tread ).
Just do whatever but don't tell us .
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200
Under fair use it means you are recording the sample (and it should
normally be just a sample not an entire track) for parody, criticism, or
other legitimate commentary.
Fair use provides no protection for arbitrarily recording protected
works for indefinite later replays, even if you have no
Fair use personal recordings are a statutory right in law for many
countries.
No contract a copyright holder claims you have entered removes or
lessens those statutory rights. In fact they are likely breaking the law
if they even imply your rights have been reduced.
So in countries where it is
The software is legal what you do with it may not be.
In U.K. it is legal to make a recording of something you own for
personal use. Digitising my vinyl to FLAC is legal but if I sell the
vinyl I should delete any copies made.
For the record I have kept every vinyl record.
*Vortexbox LMS 7.9
You also have the terms and conditions for the services .
Radio migth be just as ok as it was with god old fm and tapedeck.
But a service like spotify clearly says no in their terms and conditions
you agreed to when signing up.
So software that records you computers output may very well be
Mnyb wrote:
> Is that any legal difference between a software and a good old fashioned
> tape recorder ?
Legally no but they have not often bothered to prosecute "lossy"
recording methods like tape, historically. They were more concerned
about redistribution with the advent of perfect digital
I would record as flac because cross conversion between different lossy
codecs can introduce artifacts and sound bad.
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2
Is that any legal difference between a software and a good old fashioned
tape recorder ?
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel
I think it's rather simple: if it was legal, you wouldn't have to ask
about it. You'd go download/buy the application to do it from a vast
choice of offerings.
Quite obviously you can't easily find them, or you wouldn't have to come
to this forum.
Now if you have a Squeezebox related
Depends which country you are in but broadly speaking recording has
always been legal, it's what you record and what you do with it that
matters.
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than
Hey guys,
currently I try to get some clear informations about
recording-softwares, with which you are able to record, cut and convert
music from platforms like Spotify and Deezer into mp3-files.
While there is a big offer in the world wide web, I´m still not sure, if
they are legal or not.
If
22 matches
Mail list logo
