Hi everyone,
I've started drafting a short guide to "good enough" practices in
scientific computing, and would be grateful for your input. You can
view the outline at
http://swcarpentry.github.io/good-enough-practices-in-scientific-computing/,
and leave comments at
Hi all-
Did one of you who taught this recently come up with a fix? I've filed an
issue on the installer - make is in the .swc/bin, which is in the Windows
users' path. But typing make at the command line simply doesn't work. We've
tried downloading the executeable Trevor linked and putting it in
Hi Greg,
I only had time to skim through it. However, one thing I find is missing
in the Data Management part is something like this :
- If you have tens of thousands of files (or more), you are probably
doing it wrong. Look for archiving those files in chunks, or combining
them in some way.
I hesitate to bring up something so inflammable, but have we had the "Data is"
vs "data are" discussion and reached a consensus?
-Steve
- q•b -
> On Nov 17, 2015, at 03:10, Greg Wilson
> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've started drafting a short
Le 2015-11-17 11:15, Martin Bähr a écrit :
Excerpts from Maxime Boissonneault's message of 2015-11-17 14:29:28 +0100:
On a cluster, having tens of thousands of files will be a killer, but
even on a personnal computer, it will make your data management a
nightmare.
I have seen users who think
On 11/17/2015 5:58 PM, Maxime Boissonneault wrote:
Le 2015-11-17 11:15, Martin Bähr a écrit :
it is not the users fault that filesystems were not designed for their
needs,
and while the users should be taught how to cope with this, i consider
their
expectation that having 2.5M files in a
Perhaps this is an example of "good enough". :)
Since either form ("data is/are") seems to be acceptable in computing, we
can probably just say that either form is good enough for us. Given that
SWC serves a large number of non-native English speakers, grammar issues
could turn into a huge time
+1
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Shreyas Cholia wrote:
> Perhaps this is an example of "good enough". :)
>
> Since either form ("data is/are") seems to be acceptable in computing, we
> can probably just say that either form is good enough for us. Given that SWC
> serves a
> On 17 Nov 2015, at 21:01, Maxime Boissonneault
> wrote:
> On a side note, I still find that recording of "nano" or "vim" is rather
> cumbersome.
>
> I do not have a good solution for it however.
>
> If anyone has an idea, let me know.
Just to say, I
(My cousin works for this group, and I've been really impressed by what
they have produced. This is definitely a web / app developer job, not a
research programmer, but thought it was worth sharing).
NMSU Learning Games Lab (http://learninggameslab.org/) is hiring a
games/app programmer; please
You can do a bash Jupyter notebook.
Not completely trivial to set up so I would not be getting attendees to do it,
but it works identically to the python notebook.
The cells are a bash shell so you can do all the bash and git just like it was
in a terminal.
Also works for R although in the real
Thanks for the feedback, everyone - can we please move discussion to the
GitHub repo (file issues, etc.) so that it's all in one place?
Cheers,
Greg
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
Sorry.
I created this issue :
https://github.com/swcarpentry/good-enough-practices-in-scientific-computing/issues/24
I only posted my original comment. Feel free to re-post your comments in
the issue.
Maxime
Le 2015-11-17 13:21, Greg Wilson a écrit :
Thanks for the feedback, everyone - can
13 matches
Mail list logo