Hi Jonathon,
Jonathon Blake wrote:
[...]
But how easy is it to create a database from scratch, with the new interface?
Or maybe I should ask the question this way: Will Great Aunt Martha
be able to create a database, without calling me?
But this is not because of OOo. Right? It is probably
Arthur wrote:
making a database from scratch
Sort of.
Some Database interfaces make it much easier to create a database from
scratch, than others.
For example, it was much easier to create a database using PC File,
than using dBase3.
If OOo could provide the same sort of interface/support
Matt wrote:
This is a basic summary of the changes; there are many other changes,
But how easy is it to create a database from scratch, with the new interface?
Or maybe I should ask the question this way: Will Great Aunt Martha
be able to create a database, without calling me?
xan
jonathon
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:48, bealach wrote:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
bealach wrote:
I was only reporting what PC World said, wasn't I?
Yes. The point I was trying to make is that we can't fix it if we don't
know what the problem is.
PCWorld was totally unspecific about Ooo db, neither did
On Friday 08 April 2005 02:54, Wesley Parish wrote:
snip...
Judging from comments I have heard from various PC techies, MS
Access's problem is that it is only good for small databases, and
falls over once you try anything above a certain size.
Since OO.org connects to _serious_ databases of
Daniel Carrera wrote:
bealach wrote:
I was only reporting what PC World said, wasn't I?
Yes. The point I was trying to make is that we can't fix it if we don't
know what the problem is.
PCWorld was totally unspecific about Ooo db, neither did they say why
Access was not very good (but M$
bealach wrote:
I was only reporting what PC World said, wasn't I?
Yes. The point I was trying to make is that we can't fix it if we don't
know what the problem is.
Cheers,
--
Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org
