Re: Re: Unit testing code coverage

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Bao,Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, I will be sticking to the 1.0.9 until 1.1 goes to release. So I'll try modifying the RestletServerTestCase, and see what happens. Thanks. You should also look at HttpUnit and Selenium for testing, which test other

RE: Re: Unit testing code coverage

Stephan, I've just got to looking at the RestletServerTestCase, and it seems I'm getting some errors that I'm thinking may be because I'm using the 1.0.9 version. These are the errors I'm seeing: 1. Line 293. On the request, I don't have a setConditions() method. 2. Line 328 and 357, On my

RE: Re: Unit testing code coverage

Thanks, I will be sticking to the 1.0.9 until 1.1 goes to release. So I'll try modifying the RestletServerTestCase, and see what happens. Thanks. Sam Bao | Software Engineer | Cerner Corporation | 816.201.8242 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.cerner.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Re: Unit testing code coverage

Thanks. I'll check it out. Sam Bao | Software Engineer | Cerner Corporation | 816.201.8242 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.cerner.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 6:07 AM To: discuss@restlet.tigris.org Subject: Re: Unit