Hi Marc,
This looks good, beside the sender email address. Do you mind using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead to better reflect the URI that we'll soon use
(http://wiki.restlet.org) for it?
Thanks,
Jerome
2007/10/4, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
some explanation:
those subscribed to
Jerome Louvel wrote:
Hi Marc,
This looks good, beside the sender email address. Do you mind using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead to better reflect the URI that we'll soon use
(http://wiki.restlet.org) for it?
done
regards,
-marc=
I think you might be missing the point of JC's original request. It's
not that he wants to provide some new means of authenticating to a
service, he wants to provide a RESTful means of having the service
validate the credentials. At least that's how I read it.
In other words, a client can
Peter Lacey wrote:
he wants to provide a RESTful means of having the service
validate the credentials. At least that's how I read it.
Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is that I don't think there's
a use case for validating credentials when all that's really needed
is for a
Interesting. What were the biggest reasons for removing JSF
references/dependencies?
--Chuck
On 10/3/07, Michael Terrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chuck,
I've ported Facelets to Restlets (removed the JSF dependencies). You
can get it here: http://trac.sarugo.org/xtc
Regards,
I think we're having some nomenclature issues. See inline for more.
Adam Taft wrote:
Peter Lacey wrote:
he wants to provide a RESTful means of having the service validate
the credentials. At least that's how I read it.
Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is that I don't think
Adam Taft wrote:
Peter Lacey wrote:
In that I agree. But in my scenario the client of the authenticate
service is the resource being accessed, not the client requesting
the resource. Visually:
CLIENT -- uname/pwd --- RESOURCE -- uname/pwd ---
AUTHENTICATE SERVICE
Right,
Peter Lacey wrote:
In that I agree. But in my scenario the client of the authenticate
service is the resource being accessed, not the client requesting the
resource. Visually:
CLIENT -- uname/pwd --- RESOURCE -- uname/pwd ---
AUTHENTICATE SERVICE
Right, gotcha. The
Hi Sean,
Thanks for proposing to give a hand.
Also, I'd like to share again the links in Marc's email as they didn't get
recognized in my email client:
[1] http://restlet.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=discussmsgNo=3063
[2] http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=21
As an
Chuck Hinson wrote:
Interesting. What were the biggest reasons for removing JSF
references/dependencies?
Several really:
* JSF is a full MVC framework and I just wanted a templating engine to
create XML views. I really liked Facelet's syntax vs. Velocity and
Freemarker.
* I prefer to
On 10/4/07, Michael Terrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck Hinson wrote:
Interesting. What were the biggest reasons for removing JSF
references/dependencies?
Several really:
* JSF is a full MVC framework and I just wanted a templating engine to
create XML views. I really liked
11 matches
Mail list logo