Re: [DAISY] mails on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-10-04 Thread Jerome Louvel
Hi Marc, This looks good, beside the sender email address. Do you mind using [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead to better reflect the URI that we'll soon use (http://wiki.restlet.org) for it? Thanks, Jerome 2007/10/4, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, some explanation: those subscribed to

Re: [DAISY] mails on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-10-04 Thread Marc Portier
Jerome Louvel wrote: Hi Marc, This looks good, beside the sender email address. Do you mind using [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead to better reflect the URI that we'll soon use (http://wiki.restlet.org) for it? done regards, -marc=

Re: Restful Login/Identifier

2007-10-04 Thread Peter Lacey
I think you might be missing the point of JC's original request. It's not that he wants to provide some new means of authenticating to a service, he wants to provide a RESTful means of having the service validate the credentials. At least that's how I read it. In other words, a client can

Re: Restful Login/Identifier

2007-10-04 Thread Adam Taft
Peter Lacey wrote: he wants to provide a RESTful means of having the service validate the credentials. At least that's how I read it. Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is that I don't think there's a use case for validating credentials when all that's really needed is for a

Re: Facelets

2007-10-04 Thread Chuck Hinson
Interesting. What were the biggest reasons for removing JSF references/dependencies? --Chuck On 10/3/07, Michael Terrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chuck, I've ported Facelets to Restlets (removed the JSF dependencies). You can get it here: http://trac.sarugo.org/xtc Regards,

Re: Restful Login/Identifier

2007-10-04 Thread Peter Lacey
I think we're having some nomenclature issues. See inline for more. Adam Taft wrote: Peter Lacey wrote: he wants to provide a RESTful means of having the service validate the credentials. At least that's how I read it. Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is that I don't think

Re: Restful Login/Identifier

2007-10-04 Thread Peter Lacey
Adam Taft wrote: Peter Lacey wrote: In that I agree. But in my scenario the client of the authenticate service is the resource being accessed, not the client requesting the resource. Visually: CLIENT -- uname/pwd --- RESOURCE -- uname/pwd --- AUTHENTICATE SERVICE Right,

Re: Restful Login/Identifier

2007-10-04 Thread Adam Taft
Peter Lacey wrote: In that I agree. But in my scenario the client of the authenticate service is the resource being accessed, not the client requesting the resource. Visually: CLIENT -- uname/pwd --- RESOURCE -- uname/pwd --- AUTHENTICATE SERVICE Right, gotcha. The

RE: [docs] Poll for participation and input.

2007-10-04 Thread Jerome Louvel
Hi Sean, Thanks for proposing to give a hand. Also, I'd like to share again the links in Marc's email as they didn't get recognized in my email client: [1] http://restlet.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=discussmsgNo=3063 [2] http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=21 As an

Re: Facelets

2007-10-04 Thread Michael Terrington
Chuck Hinson wrote: Interesting. What were the biggest reasons for removing JSF references/dependencies? Several really: * JSF is a full MVC framework and I just wanted a templating engine to create XML views. I really liked Facelet's syntax vs. Velocity and Freemarker. * I prefer to

Re: Facelets

2007-10-04 Thread Chuck Hinson
On 10/4/07, Michael Terrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chuck Hinson wrote: Interesting. What were the biggest reasons for removing JSF references/dependencies? Several really: * JSF is a full MVC framework and I just wanted a templating engine to create XML views. I really liked