Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

That's fine Tal, whatever works best for you. Merging by hand won't be a big issue anyway. You might want to enter an issue in RF repo to let people discover this support and let us communicate over it. Best regards, Jerome 2013/11/7 Tal Liron > Thanks, Jerome. > > I picked the Apache License

RE: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

Thanks, Jerome. I picked the Apache License 2.0, and am hosting it as a separate project. I'm assigning joint copyright on it to Restlet S.A.S, per the contributor agreement, so you are free to merge it should you ever wish to do so: https://github.com/tliron/restlet-jetty9 Rather than a branc

Re: Re: Jetty 9?

I suggest that you create a new /restlet-framework-java/master/incubator/org.restlet.ext.jetty9 extension by copying then adapting the o.r.e.jetty extension. You can always have you own branch in GitHub and then merge it back when master becomes ready for RF 3.0 (Java 7), but from a licensing poin

RE: Re: Jetty 9?

So, I went ahead and created a Jetty 9 extension for Restlet 2.2: https://github.com/tliron/restlet-jetty9 It's not much tested (especially SSL), but it does work! There are also 2 helper parameters that I still haven't found how to duplicate on Jetty 9, so they are just be ignored. Actually, I