RE: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

2009-06-11 Thread Jerome Louvel
Cool! This class definitely needs more tests and feed-back to be as perfect as 
possible when 2.0 RC1 goes out.

 

Cheers,
Jerome

 

De : Rob Heittman [mailto:rob.heitt...@solertium.com] 
Envoyé : jeudi 11 juin 2009 16:06
À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Objet : Re: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

 

Excellent. I missed that one in the mix of ServerResource newness! I'll try it 
out on some expensive Representations and publish a benchmark.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jerome Louvel  
wrote:

Hi Rob,

Actually, we did try to facilitate this use case in Restlet 2.0. We introduced 
the RepresentationInfo class, subclass of Variant and parent of Representation. 
It contains two properties, modificationDate and tag, necessary for conditional 
processing.

In ServerResource, there are also getInfo() and getInfo(Variant) methods which 
return RepresentationInfo instances. By default, it calls get() and 
get(Variant) methods, so it is really an optional optimization.

Best regards,
Jerome Louvel
--
Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~  <http://www.restlet.org/> 
http://www.restlet.org
Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder~  <http://www.noelios.com/> 
http://www.noelios.com

De: Rob Heittman [mailto:rob.heitt...@solertium.com] 
Envoy頺 mercredi 10 juin 2009 19:23
: discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Objet: Re: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

I can't imagine how the framework would be able to figure that out on its own 
without being able to examine the Representation ... chicken, egg, chicken, egg.

Still, I understand the concern if Representations are expensive to generate. I 
wonder if the conditional logic fetches the entity body if the last modified 
date has not changed. If it doesn't (and it probably shouldn't) then you could 
just craft a Representation subclass in which the expensive stuff only happens 
when the entity body is actually read -- the headers should be enough to tell 
the engine how to handle the conditional GET.

** disclaimer ** I really don't know if that approach works, but I think it 
ought to.

- Rob

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Sherif Ahmed  wrote:

Cool,

This works as you indicate. However implementing this way has a downside. Would 
be nice that the framework could take care of sending a 304 even without having 
to get a concrete Representation which has a date set.

The idea is to avoid creating a Representation if the Resource has not changed 
and Restlet could send a 304 directly thus avoiding the cost that may be 
associated with building a Representation.

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447 
<http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361007>
 &dsMessageId=2361007

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361307

Re: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

2009-06-11 Thread Rob Heittman
Excellent.  I missed that one in the mix of ServerResource newness!  I'll
try it out on some expensive Representations and publish a benchmark.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jerome Louvel wrote:

>  Hi Rob,
>
>
>
> Actually, we did try to facilitate this use case in Restlet 2.0. We
> introduced the RepresentationInfo class, subclass of Variant and parent of
> Representation. It contains two properties, “modificationDate” and “tag”,
> necessary for conditional processing.
>
>
>
> In ServerResource, there are also getInfo() and getInfo(Variant) methods
> which return RepresentationInfo instances. By default, it calls get() and
> get(Variant) methods, so it is really an optional optimization.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Jerome Louvel
> --
> Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~ http://www.restlet.org
> Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~ http://www.noelios.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Rob Heittman [mailto:rob.heitt...@solertium.com]
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 10 juin 2009 19:23
> *À :* discuss@restlet.tigris.org
> *Objet :* Re: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header
>
>
>
> I can't imagine how the framework would be able to figure that out on its
> own without being able to examine the Representation ... chicken, egg,
> chicken, egg.
>
>
>
> Still, I understand the concern if Representations are expensive to
> generate.  I wonder if the conditional logic fetches the entity body if the
> last modified date has not changed.  If it doesn't (and it probably
> shouldn't) then you could just craft a Representation subclass in which the
> expensive stuff only happens when the entity body is actually read -- the
> headers should be enough to tell the engine how to handle the conditional
> GET.
>
>
>
> ** disclaimer ** I really don't know if that approach works, but I think it
> ought to.
>
>
>
> - Rob
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Sherif Ahmed 
> wrote:
>
> Cool,
>
> This works as you indicate. However implementing this way has a downside.
> Would be nice that the framework could take care of sending a 304 even
> without having to get a concrete Representation which has a date set.
>
> The idea is to avoid creating a Representation if the Resource has not
> changed and Restlet could send a 304 directly thus avoiding the cost that
> may be associated with building a Representation.
>
> --
>
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361007
>
>
>

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361296

RE: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

2009-06-11 Thread Jerome Louvel
Hi Rob,

 

Actually, we did try to facilitate this use case in Restlet 2.0. We
introduced the RepresentationInfo class, subclass of Variant and parent of
Representation. It contains two properties, “modificationDate” and “tag”,
necessary for conditional processing.

 

In ServerResource, there are also getInfo() and getInfo(Variant) methods
which return RepresentationInfo instances. By default, it calls get() and
get(Variant) methods, so it is really an optional optimization.

 

Best regards,
Jerome Louvel
--
Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~  <http://www.restlet.org/>
http://www.restlet.org
Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~  <http://www.noelios.com/>
http://www.noelios.com

 

 

 

De : Rob Heittman [mailto:rob.heitt...@solertium.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 10 juin 2009 19:23
À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Objet : Re: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

 

I can't imagine how the framework would be able to figure that out on its
own without being able to examine the Representation ... chicken, egg,
chicken, egg.

 

Still, I understand the concern if Representations are expensive to
generate.  I wonder if the conditional logic fetches the entity body if the
last modified date has not changed.  If it doesn't (and it probably
shouldn't) then you could just craft a Representation subclass in which the
expensive stuff only happens when the entity body is actually read -- the
headers should be enough to tell the engine how to handle the conditional
GET.

 

** disclaimer ** I really don't know if that approach works, but I think it
ought to.

 

- Rob

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Sherif Ahmed 
wrote:

Cool,

This works as you indicate. However implementing this way has a downside.
Would be nice that the framework could take care of sending a 304 even
without having to get a concrete Representation which has a date set.

The idea is to avoid creating a Representation if the Resource has not
changed and Restlet could send a 304 directly thus avoiding the cost that
may be associated with building a Representation.

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447
<http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361
007> &dsMessageId=2361007

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361273

Re: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

2009-06-10 Thread Rob Heittman
I can't imagine how the framework would be able to figure that out on its
own without being able to examine the Representation ... chicken, egg,
chicken, egg.
Still, I understand the concern if Representations are expensive to
generate.  I wonder if the conditional logic fetches the entity body if the
last modified date has not changed.  If it doesn't (and it probably
shouldn't) then you could just craft a Representation subclass in which the
expensive stuff only happens when the entity body is actually read -- the
headers should be enough to tell the engine how to handle the conditional
GET.

** disclaimer ** I really don't know if that approach works, but I think it
ought to.

- Rob

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Sherif Ahmed wrote:

> Cool,
>
> This works as you indicate. However implementing this way has a downside.
> Would be nice that the framework could take care of sending a 304 even
> without having to get a concrete Representation which has a date set.
>
> The idea is to avoid creating a Representation if the Resource has not
> changed and Restlet could send a 304 directly thus avoiding the cost that
> may be associated with building a Representation.
>
> --
>
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361007
>

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361011

RE: Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

2009-06-10 Thread Sherif Ahmed
Cool,

This works as you indicate. However implementing this way has a downside. Would 
be nice that the framework could take care of sending a 304 even without having 
to get a concrete Representation which has a date set.

The idea is to avoid creating a Representation if the Resource has not changed 
and Restlet could send a 304 directly thus avoiding the cost that may be 
associated with building a Representation.

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2361007


Re: Re: Last-Modified Header

2009-06-10 Thread Rob Heittman
Restlet provides the 304 plumbing for you.  Just setModificationDate() on
your Resource's returned Representation as Jon suggests.  The GET headers
returned from my Web site which calls this function are below.  If you hit
this resource with Firefox and watch it with Firebug as you refresh (which
does conditional GETs), you'll see 304s being returned instead.  This is all
done by Restlet internally -- my code doesn't know anything about
conditional processing.

curl -I http://solertium.com/index.html
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Expires: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:55:42 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Last-Modified: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:40:42 GMT
Content-Length: 11302
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:40:42 GMT
Set-Cookie: BROWSERID=cQv0DC1n-c0fgM3-Jl; Path=/; HttpOnly
Vary: Accept-Charset, Accept-Encoding, Accept-Language, Accept
Server: Noelios-Restlet-Engine/1.2.m1

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Sherif Ahmed wrote:

> Thanks Jon.
>
> What I am trying to accomplish is implementing the Last-Modified /
> If-Modified-Since logic. Where I would tag responses with a uniform
> "Last-Modified" header for all resources/representations and when a request
> comes in with a "If-Modified-Since" header I'd send appropriate HTTP 304
> response or completely process the response.
>
> Ideas/Best Practices to accomplish this without having to get the
> HttpServletRequest/Response objects to do this would be great
>
> > Hi Sherif,
> >
> > For custom headers whatever name you give,  "entity.modificationDate",
> > will be used.
> >
> > However, what you probably meant to do is use setModificationDate(new
> > Date()) on the entity/response representation. ie.
> > representation.setModificationDate(new Date());
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > Sherif Ahmed wrote:
> > > I've been trying to add Last-Modified Header via the following code in
> a Filter afterHandle method
> > >
> > > Form responseHeaders = (Form)
> response.getAttributes().get("org.restlet.http.headers");
> > >
> > > if (responseHeaders == null)
> > > {
> > > responseHeaders = new Form();
> > > response.getAttributes().put("org.restlet.http.headers",
> responseHeaders);
> > > }
> > > responseHeaders.add("entity.modificationDate", "Sun, 06 Nov 2005
> 14:59:42 GMT");
> > >
> > >
> > > However the header in the HTTP Response is not "Last-Modified" as I
> would have expected, rather a custom header
> > >
> > > "entity.modificationDate: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:59:42 GMT"
> > >
> > > Quick response would be much appreciated
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2360858
> > >
>
> --
>
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2360959
>

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2360964

RE: Re: Last-Modified Header

2009-06-10 Thread Sherif Ahmed
Thanks Jon.

What I am trying to accomplish is implementing the Last-Modified / 
If-Modified-Since logic. Where I would tag responses with a uniform 
"Last-Modified" header for all resources/representations and when a request 
comes in with a "If-Modified-Since" header I'd send appropriate HTTP 304 
response or completely process the response.

Ideas/Best Practices to accomplish this without having to get the 
HttpServletRequest/Response objects to do this would be great

> Hi Sherif,
> 
> For custom headers whatever name you give,  "entity.modificationDate",  
> will be used.
> 
> However, what you probably meant to do is use setModificationDate(new 
> Date()) on the entity/response representation. ie. 
> representation.setModificationDate(new Date());
> 
> Jon
> 
> Sherif Ahmed wrote:
> > I've been trying to add Last-Modified Header via the following code in a 
> > Filter afterHandle method
> >
> > Form responseHeaders = (Form) 
> > response.getAttributes().get("org.restlet.http.headers");   
> >   
> > if (responseHeaders == null)   
> > {   
> > responseHeaders = new Form();   
> > response.getAttributes().put("org.restlet.http.headers", 
> > responseHeaders);   
> > }   
> > responseHeaders.add("entity.modificationDate", "Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:59:42 
> > GMT");
> >
> >
> > However the header in the HTTP Response is not "Last-Modified" as I would 
> > have expected, rather a custom header
> >
> > "entity.modificationDate: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:59:42 GMT"
> >
> > Quick response would be much appreciated
> >
> > --
> > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2360858
> >

--
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2360959