Re: Possible bug in DateUtils.ImmutableDate

2008-06-17 Thread Mike Brzozowski
Jerome Louvel contact at noelios.com writes: JUnit tests are very easy to write. Look at the simple example attached. Done. Sorry it took so long... http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=516 ... I see you committed some changes to DateUtils that may render it obsolete. But you

RE: Possible bug in DateUtils.ImmutableDate

2008-06-17 Thread Jerome Louvel
Hi Mike, Thanks for following up on this issue. We'll look at it for 1.1 RC. Best regards, Jerome -Message d'origine- De : news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Mike Brzozowski Envoye : mardi 17 juin 2008 23:45 A : discuss@restlet.tigris.org Objet : Re: Possible bug

RE: Possible bug in DateUtils.ImmutableDate

2008-05-29 Thread Jerome Louvel
Brzozowski Envoye : mercredi 28 mai 2008 20:41 A : discuss@restlet.tigris.org Objet : Re: Possible bug in DateUtils.ImmutableDate Regarding the conditional GET support, is there any reason why you don't rely on the built-in support that we provide for Resource subclasses? I wasn't aware

Re: Possible bug in DateUtils.ImmutableDate

2008-05-28 Thread Mike Brzozowski
Regarding the conditional GET support, is there any reason why you don't rely on the built-in support that we provide for Resource subclasses? I wasn't aware this support was built-in... is there documentation somewhere for this? All I needed was to be able to set the Last Modified header and

Re: Possible bug in DateUtils.ImmutableDate

2008-05-28 Thread Stephan Koops
Hi Mike, Could you write a simple unit test illustrating the issue and attach it to a new bug report? I've never written a unit test, but it's probably high time I learned. Do you use JUnit? Yes, the Restlet project uses JUnit best regards Stephan