...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Sanjay Singh
sanjaysinghshyam...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comment
some of the projects that have been cooking over the last several years
will get some exposure
is not true. Don't be so biased to under estimate work.
I would suggest
on common platform to build a great solution.
All are welcome the the new project.
S--
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Tom Rondeau trondeau1...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sanjay Singh
sanjaysinghshyam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
I understand your concern. I agree
, 2011 at 08:20:43AM +0530, Sanjay Singh wrote:
Its not about talking high. Its community of people trying hard to press
Ettus
Research products. Putting people down is not the motto of GNURadio.
Regrading putting off from the list: Discussion is on for open source
platform
--
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote:
On 01/20/2011 09:35 PM, Sanjay Singh wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Regarding your queries
o Interface with whatever RF hardware is developed above
o Do the required DDC and CIC Decimation, and whatever else *this
specific
Your comment
some of the projects that have been cooking over the last several years
will get some exposure
is not true. Don't be so biased to under estimate work.
I would suggest to go to reputed institute to prove yourself rather honking
your capability!
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:13 AM,
Hi all,
Am disappointed with the way GNURadio is getting into.
I see all the discussion around is to promote the products of Ettus
Research.
Agreed!. Great work from Ettus Research.
But there are many boards available which are far better in capability vs
price. I don't want to mention them
patches.
S--
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Brian Padalino bpadal...@gmail.comwrote:
I changed the subject to better match the tone of the email.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Sanjay Singh
sanjaysinghshyam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Am disappointed with the way GNURadio
Its not about talking high. Its community of people trying hard to press
Ettus Research products. Putting people down is not the motto of GNURadio.
Regrading putting off from the list: Discussion is on for open source
platform. This is GNURadio platform. Here discussions are open for Ettus
Hi All,
I have USRP1(4.5 Version) purchased from Matt Ettus around 2 years back.
Am interested to sell them at half price. I have two mother boards with four
daughter boards. I had purchased it for experimenting MIMO based designs.
Since am not at all using them, now am planning to sell them.
Bitshark Rx 0x0070
Regards
sanjay
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Jason Abele ja...@ettus.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Sanjay Singh
sanjaysinghshyam...@gmail.com wrote:
I have done complete new installation of Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty and
installed
Binary packege
Hi Marcus,
uname -m is returning i686.
Regards
Sanjay
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Sanjay Singh
sanjaysinghshyam...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Marcus,
I have followed below set of lines from gnuradio build guide after installing
Fedora-13.
# yum install gnuradio usrp
# yum groupinstall
I have done complete new installation of Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty and installed
Binary packege of GNURADIO(3.2.2).
I have checked under usrpm folder usrp_dbid.py file. Following are the lines
in the file
#
# Machine generated by gen_usrp_dbid.py from usrp_dbid.dat
# Do not edit by hand. All edits
0x0053
Bitshark Rx 0x0070
Regards
sanjay
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Jason Abele ja...@ettus.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Sanjay Singh
sanjaysinghshyam...@gmail.com wrote:
I have done complete new installation of Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty and installed
Binary
Hi Eric
What is the difference between WBX_NG and WBX_LO.
If we see in the daughter boards ID's, there are two ID's available for WBX.
Which is the right EEPROM ID for WBX daughter board ?.
Regards
Sanjay
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Thanks for the information Jason.
what is the suffix _NG used for ?.
Just making sure to understand what it refers to.
Thanks and Regards
Sanjay
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Jason Abele ja...@ettus.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Sanjay Singh
sanjaysinghshyam...@gmail.com
Hello Eric,
In USRP1, I don't want AD9862 to use in my application for many reasons.
Am looking for changing four parallel pipes of ADC's into two parallel pipes
of ADC's(having interleaved IQ as in the case of DAC's).
I need only changes required to be done in FPGA. Although i know that the
ADC
16 matches
Mail list logo
