Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/20/2011 10:22 PM, Daniel Dekst wrote: > > Tried on USRP E100 kernel module 3.0.0 > Error when make. > > [ 13%] Building C object > gnuradio-core/src/lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-core.dir/filter/dotprod_fff_armv7_a.c.o > /program/gnuradio/gnuradio-core/src/lib/filter/dotprod_fff_armv7_a.c: In

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Daniel Dekst
Tried on USRP E100 kernel module 3.0.0 Error when make. [ 13%] Building C object gnuradio-core/src/lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-core.dir/filter/dotprod_fff_armv7_a.c.o /program/gnuradio/gnuradio-core/src/lib/filter/dotprod_fff_armv7_a.c: In function 'dotprod_fff_armv7_a': /program/gnuradio/gnuradio-

[Discuss-gnuradio] gr-trellis broken on next branch

2011-10-20 Thread Achilleas Anastasopoulos
After installing the next branch i realized that gr-trellis is not working properly! This is due to some work (by Ben Raynwar) that makes gr-trellis dependent on gr-digital (???) In particular the constants related to trellis_metric_type.h cannot be accessed in python/grc as part of the trellis mo

[Discuss-gnuradio] building new "next" branch successful in F15-64

2011-10-20 Thread Achilleas Anastasopoulos
___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Warning! Warning!

2011-10-20 Thread Achilleas Anastasopoulos
> All USRP daughterboards are supported in UHD. You should have no problems > with DBSRX and BasicRX. > > Tom I think this is not entirely true: I have a TVRX that is not recognised by the uhd driver... Achilleas Message: 6 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:46:22 -0

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Worked perfectly, first-attempt, with no special flags, on Arch =) Cheers, Ben I just built in on Fedora 14, on an AMD64 multi-core system. Flawless. -- Marcus Leech Principal Investigator Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium http://www.sbrac.org _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Developers call

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/2011 5:47 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: Starts in 15 minutes: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/Call20111020 Tom I can't join the call, but I'll comment that if the application gets an EPIPE, it aint *never* coming back from that. EPIPE indicates that the other side ha

[Discuss-gnuradio] Developers call

2011-10-20 Thread Tom Rondeau
Starts in 15 minutes: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/Call20111020 Tom ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Ben Hilburn
Worked perfectly, first-attempt, with no special flags, on Arch =) Cheers, Ben On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > Another big change is happening today! Josh Blum has make GNU Radio build > using cmake, and we are hoping to switch over to it completely. The 'next' > branch h

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Warning! Warning!

2011-10-20 Thread Mark Cetilia
Great, thanks for the clarification, Marcus (and Tom)… Looking forward to the new developments! Cheers, Mark -- mark.cetilia.org | mem1.com | reduxproject.com On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > > On 20/10/2011 11:58 AM, Mark Cetilia wrote: >> What does this mean in terms of

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Arturo Rinaldi
Il 20/10/2011 20:53, Josh Blum ha scritto: does this mean that i could perform the steps /mkdir build cd build cmake -DCPACK_GENERATOR=DEB ../ make package/ and make deb(s) of the current git release ? which is the switch to Basically, yes that will generate a big deb file f

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Fwd: volk build error

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/2011 3:07 PM, Josh Blum wrote: I recommend that you clean the generated files from the source tree. I think that was the issue for someone else w/ a volk issue. git clean -dfx -josh In which case, what it might mean is that generated "artifacts" have gotten checked-in to the git tree

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Fwd: volk build error

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/19/2011 08:22 PM, Stevie wrote: > Hi, > > I'm experiencing problems with volk when building on an amd64 Debian > "testing". It started when volk was first introduced to the git tree and is > also my experience with the 3.4 release. When I build I get the following: > > make[4]: Entering d

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/2011 2:35 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: I think he might be using ML's build-gnuradio script, which installs to lib64 if the directory exists, regardless of whether the operating system in RH. That's why I was confused when it didn't install to lib64 when I was testing cmake. _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
> does this mean that i could perform the steps > > /mkdir build > cd build > cmake -DCPACK_GENERATOR=DEB ../ > make package/ > > and make deb(s) of the current git release ? which is the switch to Basically, yes that will generate a big deb file for the whole project. There are

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Dan CaJacob
On 10/20/2011 02:01 PM, Josh Blum wrote: On 10/20/2011 10:46 AM, Alexandru Csete wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Josh Blum wrote: On 10/19/2011 08:42 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: On 10/19/2011 09:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: ... we need people to start using it and testing as much as possib

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/20/2011 09:00 AM, Paul M. Bendixen wrote: > 2011/10/20 Josh Blum > >> >>> >>> Volk usually also fails on the old install, the problem is , I think it >>> should detect that it was no good and take it out of the build entirely? >>> >> >> No, this is a bug that needs to be fixed. Please hel

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error configuring with cmake on USRP-E100

2011-10-20 Thread Philip Balister
On 10/20/2011 02:00 PM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > On 10/20/2011 10:51 AM, Philip Balister wrote: >> I just got this trying to build gnuradio/next with cmake on an e100: >> >> -- Performing Test HAVE_SINF >> -- Performing Test HAVE_SINF - Success >> -- Performing Test HAVE_COSF >> -- Performing Test

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Arturo Rinaldi
Il 20/10/2011 03:43, Tom Rondeau ha scritto: Another big change is happening today! Josh Blum has make GNU Radio build using cmake, and we are hoping to switch over to it completely. The 'next' branch has just pulled in his changes, and we now have parallel build systems, cmake and autofoo. We

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/20/2011 10:46 AM, Alexandru Csete wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Josh Blum wrote: >> >> >> On 10/19/2011 08:42 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: >>> On 10/19/2011 09:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: ... we need people to start using it and testing as much as possible. >>> Build went smoothly

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error configuring with cmake on USRP-E100

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/20/2011 10:51 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > I just got this trying to build gnuradio/next with cmake on an e100: > > -- Performing Test HAVE_SINF > -- Performing Test HAVE_SINF - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_COSF > -- Performing Test HAVE_COSF - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_MMAP >

[Discuss-gnuradio] Error configuring with cmake on USRP-E100

2011-10-20 Thread Philip Balister
I just got this trying to build gnuradio/next with cmake on an e100: -- Performing Test HAVE_SINF -- Performing Test HAVE_SINF - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_COSF -- Performing Test HAVE_COSF - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_MMAP -- Performing Test HAVE_MMAP - Success CMake Warning at gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Alexandru Csete
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > On 10/19/2011 08:42 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: >> On 10/19/2011 09:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: >>> ... we need people to start using it and testing as much as possible. >> Build went smoothly with cmake on Ubuntu 11.10 x64  Unfortunately, it >> bui

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Warning! Warning!

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/2011 11:58 AM, Mark Cetilia wrote: What does this mean in terms of using older non-UHD-native daughterboards such as the DBSRX& BasicRX? To be honest, I haven't checked into the UHD driver, since the daughterboards I have been working fine without it… Best, Mark UHD supports ALL o

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Fwd: volk build error

2011-10-20 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Stevie wrote: > Hi, > > I'm experiencing problems with volk when building on an amd64 Debian > "testing". It started when volk was first introduced to the git tree and is > also my experience with the 3.4 release. When I build I get the following: > > make[4]: Ent

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Warning! Warning!

2011-10-20 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Mark Cetilia wrote: > What does this mean in terms of using older non-UHD-native daughterboards > such as the DBSRX & BasicRX? > To be honest, I haven't checked into the UHD driver, since the > daughterboards I have been working fine without it… > > Best, > Mark

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Ben Hilburn
> > Also, because i use gentoo, I earlier had to give the QWT dir in order for > gnuradio to build gr-qtgui, the cmake now writes: > -- Could NOT find Qwt (missing: QWT_INCLUDE_DIRS) > ... > -- Configuring gr-qtgui support... > -- Dependency Boost_FOUND = TRUE > -- Dependency QT4_FOUND = YES > -- D

[Discuss-gnuradio] Why USRP1 cannot achieve 16 MS/s in tx?

2011-10-20 Thread Mattia Rizzi
I see that there’s a firmware to achieve 16 MS/s 8-bit in RX, why there’s no image for TX? Thanks.___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Dan CaJacob
On 10/20/2011 12:02 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 20/10/2011 11:59 AM, Dan CaJacob wrote: On 10/20/2011 09:00 AM, Martin Braun wrote: One thing that doesn't work perfect here: I always have to run 'ldconfig' after installation. Couldn't that be part of 'make install' (or am I the only one who h

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/2011 11:59 AM, Dan CaJacob wrote: On 10/20/2011 09:00 AM, Martin Braun wrote: One thing that doesn't work perfect here: I always have to run 'ldconfig' after installation. Couldn't that be part of 'make install' (or am I the only one who has this problem?). I had the same problem. But

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] fan replacement for usrp1?

2011-10-20 Thread Mark Cetilia
Thanks Robert, I hadn't ever noticed it getting hot to the touch, but I haven't tried running it w/ no fan & top on either… Best, Mark -- mark.cetilia.org | mem1.com | reduxproject.com On Oct 19, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Robert McGwier wrote: > Top on. Fire up the fastest card you have (widest band

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Dan CaJacob
On 10/20/2011 09:00 AM, Martin Braun wrote: One thing that doesn't work perfect here: I always have to run 'ldconfig' after installation. Couldn't that be part of 'make install' (or am I the only one who has this problem?). I had the same problem. But after runnin it and setting the PYTHONPATH,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Warning! Warning!

2011-10-20 Thread Mark Cetilia
What does this mean in terms of using older non-UHD-native daughterboards such as the DBSRX & BasicRX? To be honest, I haven't checked into the UHD driver, since the daughterboards I have been working fine without it… Best, Mark -- mark.cetilia.org | mem1.com | reduxproject.com On Oct 19, 2011

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Warning! Warning!

2011-10-20 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 10/20/2011 07:57 AM, Rafael Diniz wrote: > > Morning people, > > Is there any web interface where we can see the git changes? > > http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/ > > I find cloning the git repo and using qgit gives a much clearer

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > > > Volk usually also fails on the old install, the problem is , I think it > > should detect that it was no good and take it out of the build entirely? > > > > No, this is a bug that needs to be fixed. Please help. Provide compiler > versio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
> > Volk usually also fails on the old install, the problem is , I think it > should detect that it was no good and take it out of the build entirely? > No, this is a bug that needs to be fixed. Please help. Provide compiler version gcc --version and all error verbose. Thanks. > >> Also, cmak

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 / Tunnel.py packet reflection issue

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/2011 10:25 AM, David Barton wrote: I have been troubleshooting an issue with possible packet relflections and cannot figure out the cause. I am running tunnel.py on two USRP2s that are cabled together with a 20dB attenuator between them. The settings I am using on both sides for tunnel

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Paul M. Bendixen
2011/10/20 Josh Blum > > > On 10/20/2011 04:19 AM, Paul M. Bendixen wrote: > > Hi happy to hear it, autotools were complaining about old syntax on my > > machine > > > > Using gentoo (not too heavily updated I'm afraid) and not succeding > > > > Configuring using cmake went well, but compiling di

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/20/2011 04:19 AM, Paul M. Bendixen wrote: > Hi happy to hear it, autotools were complaining about old syntax on my > machine > > Using gentoo (not too heavily updated I'm afraid) and not succeding > > Configuring using cmake went well, but compiling didn't, already at first > stop volk (t

[Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 / Tunnel.py packet reflection issue

2011-10-20 Thread David Barton
  I have been troubleshooting an issue with possible packet relflections and cannot figure out the cause. I am running tunnel.py on two USRP2s that are cabled together with a 20dB attenuator between them. The settings I am using on both sides for tunnel.py are:   Tx Gain: 15 dB Rx Gain: 10 dB Ca

[Discuss-gnuradio] Fw: Call for Papers: (ICC2012) SaCoNeT-III

2011-10-20 Thread Sajjad Ali Mushtaq
Please accept our apologies in advance , if you receive this CFP multiple times. == Please Spread the word! Call for Papers 3rd IEEE International Workshop on SmArt COmmunications in NEtwork Technologies (SaCoNeT-III) http://ww

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Martin Braun
> Details about using cmake can be found here: > http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/CMakeWork I'm loving it! And less build stuff thanks to the lack of usrp*... great! One thing that doesn't work perfect here: I always have to run 'ldconfig' after installation. Couldn't that be pa

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Warning! Warning!

2011-10-20 Thread Philip Balister
On 10/20/2011 07:57 AM, Rafael Diniz wrote: > Morning people, > Is there any web interface where we can see the git changes? http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/ I find cloning the git repo and using qgit gives a much clearer picture of how the branches work though. Philip > > Best regards,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] build-gnuradio under Ubuntu 11.10

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/11 01:51 AM, Dan CaJacob wrote: > It worked for me on Ubuntu 11.10 x64 > > > Thanks! > On Oct 17, 2011, at 1:31 PM, "Marcus D. Leech" wrote: > > >> Could somebody try build-gnuradio under Ubuntu 11.10 and give me feedback >> about work/not-work. There's currently >> a pre-reqs p

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Warning! Warning!

2011-10-20 Thread Rafael Diniz
Morning people, Is there any web interface where we can see the git changes? Best regards, Rafael Diniz > We are REMOVING the USRP and USRP2 components from GNU Radio! > > It's been mentioned in the past, but the change on the next branch > is imminent. As of GNU Radio 3.5, we will no longer supp

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Paul M. Bendixen
Hi happy to hear it, autotools were complaining about old syntax on my machine Using gentoo (not too heavily updated I'm afraid) and not succeding Configuring using cmake went well, but compiling didn't, already at first stop volk (that I'm not entirely sure i need) a _lot_ of errors occured. To