Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-23 Thread Maitry Raval
tell me, when am i dong wrong. With Best Regards, Maitry Raval, - Original Message - From: "Maitry Raval" To: "Cinaed Simson" Cc: "discuss-gnuradio" Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 10:11:18 AM Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access c

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-17 Thread Maitry Raval
y 15, 2019 10:25:52 AM Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block Actually, with the Default Header Format file, and the Protocol Formatter, use correlation-access tagged block was a piece of cake. Also, here's an example of bspk using constellations - if you haven't f

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-14 Thread Cinaed Simson
tput of PSK demod block, because the meaning of unpack k=1 means byte to >> byte conversion, right? >> >> With Best Regards, >> Maitry Raval, >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Cinaed Simson" >> To: "Maitry Raval" >> Cc: &

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-14 Thread Cinaed Simson
est Regards, > Maitry Raval, > > - Original Message - > From: "Cinaed Simson" > To: "Maitry Raval" > Cc: "discuss-gnuradio" > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 2:11:54 AM > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-ta

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-11 Thread Cinaed Simson
uot;Maitry Raval" > Cc: "discuss-gnuradio" > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 2:11:54 AM > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block > > On 1/10/19 2:47 AM, Maitry Raval wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Thanks for your time! &

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-10 Thread Maitry Raval
itry Raval" Cc: "discuss-gnuradio" Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 2:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block On 1/10/19 2:47 AM, Maitry Raval wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for your time! > > It works completely fine, now I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-10 Thread Cinaed Simson
mson" > To: "discuss-gnuradio" > Cc: "Maitry Raval" > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 1:21:34 PM > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block > > Hi Mailry - I was able to get it run. > > I used the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-10 Thread Daniel Estévez
El 08/01/19 a las 22:14, Müller, Marcus (CEL) escribió: > As indicated, have you worked through the tutorials on > https://tutorials.gnuradio.org? > That's the place where I'd start. > You should drop *all* the blocks that are deprecated. As said, these > are deprecated for a reason (buggy and

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-10 Thread Maitry Raval
ed Simson" To: "discuss-gnuradio" Cc: "Maitry Raval" Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 1:21:34 PM Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block Hi Mailry - I was able to get it run. I used the "correlate access" block from gnurad

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-10 Thread Cinaed Simson
; Maitry Raval, > > > - Original Message - > From: "Cinaed Simson" > To: "discuss-gnuradio" > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 1:47:56 PM > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block > > I broke down and looked at

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-09 Thread Maitry Raval
> > > - Original Message - > From: "Cinaed Simson" > To: "discuss-gnuradio" > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 1:47:56 PM > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block > > I broke down and looked at the image. >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-08 Thread CEL
-- > From: "Cinaed Simson" > To: "discuss-gnuradio" > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 1:47:56 PM > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block > > I broke down and looked at the image. > > Note, PSK Demod, Correlate Access Cod

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-08 Thread Maitry Raval
at the output. With Best Regards, Maitry Raval, - Original Message - From: "Cinaed Simson" To: "discuss-gnuradio" Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 1:47:56 PM Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block I broke down and looked at the image. Note,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-08 Thread Cinaed Simson
I broke down and looked at the image. Note, PSK Demod, Correlate Access Code - Tag, Packet Encoder, and Packet Decoder have been depreciated. And they're usually depreciated because they have problems - and they are usually replaced with different blocks which work better and are typically more

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-07 Thread Thomas Lavarenne
Oh, it is "File Sink" not "Tagged file sink", didn't see sorry. Le mar. 8 janv. 2019 à 08:20, Thomas Lavarenne a écrit : > > > Hi, > > But, the issue is that correlate access code-tag block is not working and >> producing tags, so that my output file will come blank. as I am certain >> that at

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-07 Thread Thomas Lavarenne
Hi, But, the issue is that correlate access code-tag block is not working and > producing tags, so that my output file will come blank. as I am certain > that at the output of FEC extended decoder, both the sync bits and payload > is available which I have seen by attaching file sink at the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding correlate access code-tag block

2019-01-07 Thread Cinaed Simson
Incidentally, you may not be able to see your posts but this is the third post of "Regarding correlate access code-tag block". Also, you really haven't provide - at least for me - sufficient information to reproduce the problem, i.e., the grc and input files. I'll punt to someone else who might