Hi Andrej, hey folks,
> Development of Python bindings with PyBind11 could even happen in a
separate CMake project
hm, that sounds like an additional complication,
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:07 +0100, Andrej Rode wrote:
> since the only thing required for Python
> bindings are available headers
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:30:05 -0800
Martin Braun wrote:
> Here's a summary of of comments that have come up in chat:
>
> - Andrej recommended using PyBind11, a close cousin to boost.python.
> it comes recommended by Sebastian Koslowski also. It's only a few
> headers and we could ship it
Here's a summary of of comments that have come up in chat:
- Andrej recommended using PyBind11, a close cousin to boost.python. it
comes recommended by Sebastian Koslowski also. It's only a few headers and
we could ship it as part of the source tree.
- The question arose if we even need the
