Hi Riccardo,
2009/4/22 Riccardo Mottola mul...@ngi.it:
Hi,
Richard Danter wrote:
I have tried installing GNUstep on both an Ubuntu Linux machine with a
GNOME desktop and on a NetBSD machine which is rather old (hardware, not
NetBSD version) and since it can't cope with either GNOME or KDE
On 23 Apr 2009, at 00:28, Yen-Ju Chen wrote:
I am also watching a new window manager called i3.
It is written in XCB, a supposed replacement for xlib.
XCB should be faster than xlib and can use cairo as backend.
But it is still at very early stage.
XCB is now very stable and
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:41 PM, David Chisnall thera...@sucs.org wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 00:28, Yen-Ju Chen wrote:
I am also watching a new window manager called i3.
It is written in XCB, a supposed replacement for xlib.
XCB should be faster than xlib and can use cairo as backend.
But
I see some discussion about a port of GNUstep to DirectFB. Does anyone
have a working implementation and code they can share?
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Hi. Newbie again. More newbie = wider user base
I tried to compile my own gnustep because the packages from Debian has only
arts/cairo both are referred to as not stable or not fast for remote X.
Besides I don't have to have the new features like freetype fonts.
I compiled according to gnustep
Hi David,
could you please detail a bit on the benefits of an XCB backend compared to an
Xlib one?
As you already pointed out newer versions of Xlib are internally able to use
XCB, so what can we gain by using it directly?
Fred
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 23 Apr 2009
Hi Fred,
On 23 Apr 2009, at 16:12, Fred Kiefer wrote:
could you please detail a bit on the benefits of an XCB backend
compared to an Xlib one?
As you already pointed out newer versions of Xlib are internally
able to use XCB, so what can we gain by using it directly?
The big advantages
El jue, 23-04-2009 a las 23:04 +0800, 张韡武 escribió:
Hi. Newbie again. More newbie = wider user base
I compiled according to gnustep build guide, from gnustep-base, gnustep-gui,
gnustep-back (with xlib options) and gworkspace. all compiles fine without
error message. But newly compiled
On 23 Apr., 17:18, David Chisnall thera...@sucs.org wrote:
Hi Fred,
On 23 Apr 2009, at 16:12, Fred Kiefer wrote:
could you please detail a bit on the benefits of an XCB backend
compared to an Xlib one?
As you already pointed out newer versions of Xlib are internally
able to use
I should have mentioned that the main speed limit is doing alpha-
blending on client side (Xrender does it where it belongs to: in the X
server). This means grabbing some portion from the screen buffer on
the server, sending over network, doing alpha blending, and sending
back. So each pixel is
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:38 +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
Which back end are you using, and is it correctly configured?
Default installs seem to use art on Ubuntu, I tried cairo also, don't
remember what it was for the GNUSTEP Live CD.
Rich
I typically use GNUstep via remote SSH either from
On Apr 23, 10:12 pm, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi David,
could you please detail a bit on the benefits of an XCB backend compared to
an Xlib one?
As you already pointed out newer versions of Xlib are internally able to use
XCB, so what can we gain by using it directly?
Fred
12 matches
Mail list logo
