Hi,
Sorry, I wasn't really following this discussion.
Regarding rint, it should be avoided because the behaviour with numbers ending
in .5 can be almost anything, and the default on a lot of platforms is a really
weird banker's rounding that rounds x.5 to the closest even number.
Hi,
since -base tests are fine now for me, I'm back to -gui: The following tests
are still failing for me on OpenBSD i386 5.0 -current:
Testing lazy_copy.m...
Running gui/NSPasteboard/lazy_copy.m...
which happens to fail randomly.
Testing setDelegate_reload.m...
Running
On Sunday, October 30, 2011 14:07 CET, Sebastian Reitenbach
sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote:
Hi,
since -base tests are fine now for me, I'm back to -gui: The following tests
are still failing for me on OpenBSD i386 5.0 -current:
Testing lazy_copy.m...
Running
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:18 CEST, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de
wrote:
First off and completely unrelated to the actual issue: GNUstep seems to
use fake main on your system. Why is this the case? As far as I know
this shouldn't be needed on any normal operating system. Could you
First off and completely unrelated to the actual issue: GNUstep seems to
use fake main on your system. Why is this the case? As far as I know
this shouldn't be needed on any normal operating system. Could you
please check the configuration output of base to find out what is going
on here?
Hi,
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:18 CEST, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de
wrote:
First off and completely unrelated to the actual issue: GNUstep seems to
use fake main on your system. Why is this the case? As far as I know
this shouldn't be needed on any normal operating system. Could
On 5 Oct 2011, at 10:46, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:18 CEST, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de
wrote:
First off and completely unrelated to the actual issue: GNUstep seems to
use fake main on your system. Why is this the case? As far as I know
this
On 5 Oct 2011, at 11:18, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Besides its ugly, and forces one more step to do on the user before he can
use gnustep programs, is there any good advantage of using procfs instead of
the fake main?
Will stuff be noticeably faster, more stable, whatever?
The fake main
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011 12:41 CEST, David Chisnall thera...@sucs.org
wrote:
On 5 Oct 2011, at 11:18, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Besides its ugly, and forces one more step to do on the user before he can
use gnustep programs, is there any good advantage of using procfs instead
Sorry for bringing this subject up. Better ignore it for now and stay on
the original topic. If fake main is needed for your system and works,
then it is ok to use it. There are a few drawbacks, but you can look
into the options here later on.
Fred
On 05.10.2011 13:38, Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi,
installing gworkspace now with everything from svn, the initial problem seems
to be gone.
I ran the tests with --debug, and examined the test a bit, that Fred pointed me
to investigate, below is what gdb gives me, I hope it helps. Otherwise, where
else should I set a breakpoint and
11 matches
Mail list logo
