Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

The package builds in a Docker container targeting trusty. I /think/ I got it building inside a trusty pbuilder environment, too, which /should/ be reasonably similar to what Canonical is bound to be doing. I did not get around to pinpointing the actual issue yet. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015, 18:41

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

That is the idea. But currently that cannot happen. Current status is that Launchpad's PPA builder apparently cannot find clang for libobjc2, even though I declared it in the Build-Depends field. Debugging this kind of things is annoying as I need to rebuild the source package (which, with

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

are you targetting 15.10? I now 14.04 and 14.10 ubuntu releases don't build gnustep with clang out of the box, I think even 15.04 does not build with clang out of the box, but the latest that does came out does. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Ivan Vučica wrote: > That is the

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

You built clang from sources, and that is why it works for you. ubuntu 15.10 works out of the box, no need to build clang. I don't know what it entails to build binaries with a compiler that is not part of the distro and then build the .deb's, are these debs building clang before building

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

I built gustep (from svn) with clang, the compiler I use for every thing, on ubuntu 13.10, 14.04, 14.10, 15.04, 15.10. All both by updating to the gnustep from svn and installing it from the svn from scratch. I also built clang from source, ever stable release. I never installed gnustep, on any

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Great! Maybe Gregory can put them on the gnustep page as a ppa so that folks using ubuntu can use them :) is it automatable? On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Ivan Vučica wrote: > Breakage that I discovered during the GS meeting (Debian package build > system complaining about

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Breakage that I discovered during the GS meeting (Debian package build system complaining about libobjc missing specification of dependencies) has been fixed. I'll send an update when I am ready to upload new packages to a PPA. I could not squeeze cmake's cpack into submission to build the binary

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Michele Bert wrote: > > What does 'apt-get upgrade' gives you ? > > > > Here you are: > The following packages have been kept back: > affiche.app agenda.app easydiff.app gnustep-back0.24-cairo > gnustep-base-runtime gnustep-gpbs gnustep-gui-common

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

2015-10-15 12:44 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > Ok, I guess there are dependencies problems... Sorry but I won't have > time to look into this or rebuild packages before long... > Not a big problem! I can survive with the outdated tools (as long as we don't decide for a

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

2015-10-14 14:17 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:13:21PM +0200, Michele Bert wrote: > > 2015-10-11 21:30 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > > > > > Well, 12.04 is getting really old... You could try the wheezy packages > > > at

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

2015-10-11 21:30 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > Well, 12.04 is getting really old... You could try the wheezy packages > at http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/wheezy/i386/ but I > have no idea if they will work or even install on your distro, the > problem being the

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:13:21PM +0200, Michele Bert wrote: > 2015-10-11 21:30 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > > > Well, 12.04 is getting really old... You could try the wheezy packages > > at http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/wheezy/i386/ but I > > have no idea

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Hi Mick, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:25AM +0200, Michele Bert wrote: > 2015-06-03 13:14 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > > Hi all, > > > > I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 > > and amd64). Packages are built with the available clang and

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

> I would like to get some suggestion on how to manage my gnustep > installation on Ubuntu 12.04 (i386). I notice (several months ago) > that there aren't those packages any more, and I wander if there is a > way to use one of the debian package set instead, or I have to switch > to an svn/self

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

2015-06-03 13:14 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > Hi all, > > I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 > and amd64). Packages are built with the available clang and libobjc2 > (called libobjcgs). I would like to get some suggestion on how to manage my

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Thanks Ivan! Il 07/07/2015 18:53, Ivan Vučica ha scritto: On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr mailto:p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:15:41AM +, Ivan Vučica wrote: The build currently breaks within gnustep-base. I have a

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On 7 Jul 2015, at 17:53, Ivan Vučica i...@vucica.net wrote: - It's still using libobjc2 from GNUstep's Subversion repository, and not the one in David's repository on Github FYI: This is now moved back to the GNUstep organisation on GitHub[1] and that’s where the FreeBSD port fetches it

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:15:41AM +, Ivan Vučica wrote: The build currently breaks within gnustep-base. I have a patch from November for Source/Additions/GSObjCRuntime.m and Source/NSException.m, but it's

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On 6 June 2015 at 14:44, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Honestly I don't even know why I'm building those packages. I don't use them and I mostly stopped using GNUstep all together (for various reasons), I'm not going to invest more time in this. Well, I am very grateful to you

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

These things are largely obvious and useless, as talking about them is easier than doing them... Riccardo Mottola wrote: As Philippe wrote: packaging is a non-rewarding, terrible job. Debian Packages are already quite debatable due to packaging choices that were imposed (the way they are

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Hi, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: If the people on this list find clang-ish GNUstep an ok idea, then I agree that a move in this direction is desirable. Maybe not to the Debian list but to the current maintainers of these packages (such as Yavor mentioned in the last message). All the

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

should write on the Debian mailing list, asking for the possibilities to build gnustep and related software with clang. If the people on this list find clang-ish GNUstep an ok idea, then I agree that a move in this direction is desirable. Maybe not to the Debian list but to the current

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

If there is no objections then I can link to this thread and propose the compiler change at this list: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnustep-maintainers Svetlana ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:06:59PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:14:05PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi all, I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 and amd64). Packages are built with the available clang and libobjc2 (called

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 01:52:08PM +0200, Alessandro Sangiuliano wrote: Should not be a problem for Philippe to compile everything present in his private repo with clang (gnustep and stepchat) and then package them making .deb packages and pushing them in the repo. It just takes time and some

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:25:28PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: you would like to add another package StepChat Like much of Etoile stuff, I understand that StepChat must be compiled with clang and requires a clang-compiled GNUstep, and I would like to see all this stuff in Debian

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Should not be a problem for Philippe to compile everything present in his private repo with clang (gnustep and stepchat) and then package them making .deb packages and pushing them in the repo. The problem is that the packages inside the Philippe's repo can conflict with the official debian

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Both clang and gcc are viable compilers to use to build GNUstep. The clang compiler supports more features than gcc currently does and, thus, enables more applications. I have no problem with it. GC On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 9:18 AM Svetlana A. Tkachenko svetl...@members.fsf.org wrote: should

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Sometimes I get frustrated... I'll not rant on their mailing list, but I want to be clear about a thing: to me the use of clang insted of gcc is not a political choice, is a thecnical choice, all the App I write are using the ARC clang features, to handle the memory, both if they contain

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

you would like to add another package StepChat Like much of Etoile stuff, I understand that StepChat must be compiled with clang and requires a clang-compiled GNUstep, and I would like to see all this stuff in Debian someday (I am still in the process of working out how they may handle it

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:14:05PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi all, I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 and amd64). Packages are built with the available clang and libobjc2 (called libobjcgs). Please note that I haven't tested any of this yet.

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Hello, nice work! In the repo links you posted, I don’t see vindaloo and popplerkit, I just see iconkit. Do you used clang for the build process? Il giorno 03/giu/2015, alle ore 13:14, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr ha scritto: Hi all, I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:09:38PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: Thanks. Would like to add netclasses and talksoup. Will do if possible. Thanks, Philippe -- Its always easier short term to pee in the pond than install a toilet - it's just not a good long term plan. Alan Cox

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Thanks. Would like to add netclasses and talksoup. Svetlana ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 09:36:16AM +0200, Alessandro Sangiuliano wrote: Hello, nice work! Thanks ! In the repo links you posted, I don’t see vindaloo and popplerkit, I just see iconkit. Yep, I had to disable those two for some architectures because of a compilation error of popplerkit with

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Oh, and my understanding is that Debian's gnustep-* packages are compiled using gcc. Am I wrong? If not, then how may this valuable set of packages compiled with clang be put into the main Debian repositories? Svetlana ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:11:21PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: Oh, and my understanding is that Debian's gnustep-* packages are compiled using gcc. Am I wrong? If not, then how may this valuable set of packages compiled with clang be put into the main Debian repositories? You would

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:07:09AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: On 4 Jun 2015, at 08:51, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:11:21PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: Oh, and my understanding is that Debian's gnustep-* packages are compiled using gcc.

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On 4 Jun 2015, at 08:51, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:11:21PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: Oh, and my understanding is that Debian's gnustep-* packages are compiled using gcc. Am I wrong? If not, then how may this valuable set of packages

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Hi Philippe, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi all, I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 and amd64). Packages are built with the available clang and libobjc2 (called libobjcgs). Thank you for the great work! Please note that I haven't tested any of this yet.

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

o/ I've been toying with using Clang for building Debian packages back in November. Backstory of how I got there, for those interested, is below. So how did I go about it? - install gcc and g++ - install clang-3.5 -- explicitly - symlink all gcc-X.Y and g++-X.Y to clang and clang++, respectively

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Hi, On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: Perhaps adding BatMon.app for laptop users could be useful. Ok, I can try and see if it builds without problem. Did you have any troubles building or local patches to apply? Not sure, I would have to check all packages.

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:48 PM Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: On recent distributions I had to remove the objc/ include folder coming from gcc for gnustep-base to compile otherwise it correctly found libobjc2 but used gcc's libobjc headers. I guess something could be done on

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 03:15:16PM +, Ivan Vučica wrote: Do you have documentation/scripts for your build process? I have some ugly scripts and a Makefile but the build itself is done using pbuilder. I'm using source files checked out from the different repositories with debian/ folders

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Do you have documentation/scripts for your build process? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:14 PM Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Hi all, I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 and amd64). Packages are built with the available clang and libobjc2 (called

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi Philippe, On 13 Aug 2012, at 22:29, Philippe Roussel wrote: I built and installed libobjc2 from svn trunk to /usr/local with make -f Makefile install On GNU/Linux, /usr/local is not in the compiler's search path, so you will need to specify this path explicitly. I would recommend setting

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi, Le 14/08/2012 09:54, David Chisnall a écrit : Hi Philippe, On 13 Aug 2012, at 22:29, Philippe Roussel wrote: I built and installed libobjc2 from svn trunk to /usr/local with make -f Makefile install On GNU/Linux, /usr/local is not in the compiler's search path, so you will need

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On 14 Aug 2012, at 09:32, Philippe Roussel wrote: I'm thinking about building libobjc2 so that the library is called libobjc2.so. That could simplify thinks a bit. That's what Sebastian does for OpenBSD. It makes it a bit easier to switch between the two. David -- Sent from my brain

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Le 14/08/2012 10:49, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit : On 14 Aug 2012, at 09:32, Philippe Roussel wrote: [snip] I'm thinking about building libobjc2 so that the library is called libobjc2.so. That could simplify thinks a bit. If you want to use libobjc2 with gnustep, the easy way to do

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Le 14/08/2012 10:41, David Chisnall a écrit : On 14 Aug 2012, at 09:32, Philippe Roussel wrote: I'm thinking about building libobjc2 so that the library is called libobjc2.so. That could simplify thinks a bit. That's what Sebastian does for OpenBSD. It makes it a bit easier to switch

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Note that the GNUmakefile, last time I tried it, did not build a working Objective-C++ runtime. David On 14 Aug 2012, at 09:49, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: On 14 Aug 2012, at 09:32, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi, Le 14/08/2012 09:54, David Chisnall a écrit : Hi Philippe, On 13 Aug

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On 14 Aug 2012, at 09:32, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi, Le 14/08/2012 09:54, David Chisnall a écrit : Hi Philippe, On 13 Aug 2012, at 22:29, Philippe Roussel wrote: I built and installed libobjc2 from svn trunk to /usr/local with make -f Makefile install On GNU/Linux, /usr/local is

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:32 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Hi, Le 14/08/2012 09:54, David Chisnall a écrit : Hi Philippe, On 13 Aug 2012, at 22:29, Philippe Roussel wrote: I built and installed libobjc2 from svn trunk to /usr/local with make -f

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi Sebastian, Le 14/08/2012 12:08, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I'm thinking about building libobjc2 so that the library is called libobjc2.so. That could simplify thinks a bit. For OpenBSD I have something similar, calling the library libobjc2. It's not yet in the officical ports,

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On 14. 8. 2012., at 09:54, David Chisnall thera...@sucs.org wrote: On GNU/Linux, /usr/local is not in the compiler's search path, so you will need to specify this path explicitly. I would recommend setting PREFIX to /usr for GNU/Linux. It isn't? I'd swear that, when I install various

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi David, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:24:43PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: On 22 Jul 2012, at 19:49, Philippe Roussel wrote: I tried to use libobjc2, and did a preliminary debianization, but ran into linking errors when using gcc 4.7 and didn't investigate much Please let me know what

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi Philippe, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Le 27/07/2012 20:16, Csanyi Pal a écrit : Germán A. Arias ger...@xelalug.org writes: El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 12:11 +0200, Csanyi Pal escribió: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Please let me know if you find this

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi, On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:23:57PM +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: Hi Philippe, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Le 27/07/2012 20:16, Csanyi Pal a écrit : Germán A. Arias ger...@xelalug.org writes: El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 12:11 +0200, Csanyi Pal escribió: Philippe

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:23:57PM +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Le 27/07/2012 20:16, Csanyi Pal a écrit : Germán A. Arias ger...@xelalug.org writes: El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 12:11 +0200, Csanyi Pal

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: I can start EOModelEditor and I can see it's menu but when I hide it with it's icon I lost the menu so I can't use it anymore. Well, that's probably a bad interaction between EOModelEditor and your window manager. Are you using

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: I can start EOModelEditor and I can see it's menu but when I hide it with it's icon I lost the menu so I can't use it anymore. Well, that's probably a bad interaction between

GDL2 can't build [Was: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages]

El lun, 06-08-2012 a las 00:02 +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach escribió: On Sunday, August 5, 2012 20:09 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 05/08/2012 20:05, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I just tried to add gdl2 and EOModelEditor packages, starting with the original

Re: GDL2 can't build [Was: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages]

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 08:02 CEST, Germán A. Arias ger...@xelalug.org wrote: El lun, 06-08-2012 a las 00:02 +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach escribió: On Sunday, August 5, 2012 20:09 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 05/08/2012 20:05, Sebastian Reitenbach a

Re: GDL2 can't build [Was: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages]

El mié, 08-08-2012 a las 08:36 +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach escribió: Do you build the plain gdl2 from source, or build the package? The Debian packages build the /EOModel and /DBModeler _and_ the /Apps/EOModelEditor, /Apps/EOModel. I think you should only build one of them, not both. The

Re: GDL2 can't build [Was: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages]

Germán A. Arias wrote: El lun, 06-08-2012 a las 00:02 +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach escribió: On Sunday, August 5, 2012 20:09 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 05/08/2012 20:05, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I just tried to add gdl2 and EOModelEditor packages, starting

Re: GDL2 can't build [Was: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages]

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 09:36 CEST, Wolfgang Lux wolfgang@gmail.com wrote: Germán A. Arias wrote: El lun, 06-08-2012 a las 00:02 +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach escribió: On Sunday, August 5, 2012 20:09 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 05/08/2012

Re: GDL2 can't build [Was: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages]

Le 08/08/2012 08:36, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I have the same problem to build GDL2. This is with GNUstep from SVN and GCC 4.6.1. Do you build the plain gdl2 from source, or build the package? The Debian packages build the /EOModel and /DBModeler _and_ the /Apps/EOModelEditor,

Re: GDL2 can't build [Was: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages]

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 09:45 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 08/08/2012 08:36, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I have the same problem to build GDL2. This is with GNUstep from SVN and GCC 4.6.1. Do you build the plain gdl2 from source, or build the

Re: GDL2 can't build [Was: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages]

El mié, 08-08-2012 a las 09:56 +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach escribió: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 09:45 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 08/08/2012 08:36, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I have the same problem to build GDL2. This is with GNUstep from SVN and

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi, Le 27/07/2012 20:16, Csanyi Pal a écrit : Germán A. Arias ger...@xelalug.org writes: El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 12:11 +0200, Csanyi Pal escribió: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Please let me know if you find this useful, if a package is broken, if you would like to add

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On Sunday, August 5, 2012 17:43 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Hi Le 27/07/2012 20:03, Germán A. Arias a écrit : Hi Csanyi El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 12:11 +0200, Csanyi Pal escribió: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Please let me know if you

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Le 05/08/2012 20:05, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I just tried to add gdl2 and EOModelEditor packages, starting with the original debian packaging, and I failed... The thing is, I cannot compile gdl2 from svn. Can someone take a look ? Works for me against latest releases of gnustep-core

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On Sunday, August 5, 2012 20:09 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 05/08/2012 20:05, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I just tried to add gdl2 and EOModelEditor packages, starting with the original debian packaging, and I failed... The thing is, I cannot compile gdl2

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On Sunday, August 5, 2012 20:09 CEST, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 05/08/2012 20:05, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit : I just tried to add gdl2 and EOModelEditor packages, starting with the original debian packaging, and I failed... The thing is, I cannot compile gdl2

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

I'll take a look when I'll get back from vacations. Philippe - Mail original - De: Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com À: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Juillet 2012 20:16:29 Objet: Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages Germán A. Arias ger...@xelalug.org writes: El vie, 27-07-2012

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Please let me know if you find this useful, if a package is broken, if you would like to add another package to the list etc. I would like to add the following packages or applications to the list: application: DBModeler packages: gnustep-dl2, the

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi Csanyi El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 12:11 +0200, Csanyi Pal escribió: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Please let me know if you find this useful, if a package is broken, if you would like to add another package to the list etc. I would like to add the following packages or

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Germán A. Arias ger...@xelalug.org writes: El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 12:11 +0200, Csanyi Pal escribió: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Please let me know if you find this useful, if a package is broken, if you would like to add another package to the list etc. I would like

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: The packages list looks like : * gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related dev packages * addressmanager * agenda * cynthiune (didn't build for some configs) * easydiff * edenmath * gnumail * gorm * gworkspace * gnustep-examples *

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Le 24/07/2012 10:02, Csanyi Pal a écrit : [snip] I install addressmanager.app and gnumail.app too and with these I have problems: $ AddressManager AddressManager: error while loading shared libraries: libgnustep-gui.so.0.20: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Le 24/07/2012 10:02, Csanyi Pal a écrit : [snip] I install addressmanager.app and gnumail.app too and with these I have problems: $ AddressManager AddressManager: error while loading shared libraries: libgnustep-gui.so.0.20: cannot open

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Le 23/07/2012 06:35, Csanyi Pal a écrit : Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: defaults read NSGlobalDomain NSGlobalDomain NSUserFixedPitchFont Arial NSGlobalDomain GSBackend libgnustep-art Please try 'default write NSGlobalDomain GSBackend libgnustep-cairo' and if it doesn't work

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Le 23/07/2012 06:35, Csanyi Pal a écrit : Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: defaults read NSGlobalDomain NSGlobalDomain NSUserFixedPitchFont Arial NSGlobalDomain GSBackend libgnustep-art Please try 'default write NSGlobalDomain

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 08:49:23PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi all, Now that I have a somewhat automated build process it would be nice to have some feedback on the result. I tried to use libobjc2, and did a preliminary debianization, but ran into linking errors when using gcc 4.7

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 08:49:23PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi all, Now that I have a somewhat automated build process it would be nice to have some feedback on the result. I tried to use libobjc2, and did a preliminary debianization,

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi, This seems to be due to a missing GPG signing key. From the Debian Administrator's Handbook, Raphaël Hertzog and Roland Mas, 1212, ISBN: 979-10-91414-00-5 (paperback) ISBN: 979-10-91414-01-2 (ebook) http://debian-handbook.info/ see page 120 When a third-party package source is added to the

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:19:25PM +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: [snip] Resolving dependencies... The following packages will be REMOVED: gnustep-back0.20{u} gnustep-back0.20-art{u} libgnustep-base1.22{u} libgnustep-gui0.20{u} The following packages will be upgraded:

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi Philippe, Signing and publishing your public key would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -- Gerold Rupprecht 10, rue Louis-Curval CH-1206 Genève, Suisse Mobile: +41 79 914 29 52 On lun, 2012-07-23 at 18:12 +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:19:25PM +0200, Csanyi Pal

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi Gerold, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:34:42PM +0200, Gerold Rupprecht wrote: Hi Philippe, Signing and publishing your public key would be greatly appreciated. I did a test for wheezy amd64 packages. My key number is 9AE41A0D. Its fingerprint is : 832B 6E4E 5701 DC82 9F89 DC87 49C3 1478

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:06:55PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi Gerold, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:34:42PM +0200, Gerold Rupprecht wrote: Hi Philippe, Signing and publishing your public key would be greatly appreciated. I did a test for wheezy amd64 packages. My key number is

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Le 23/07/2012 20:06, Philippe Roussel a écrit : Hi Gerold, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:34:42PM +0200, Gerold Rupprecht wrote: Hi Philippe, Signing and publishing your public key would be greatly appreciated. I did a test for wheezy amd64 packages. My key number is 9AE41A0D. Its

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

I realize there aren't a huge number of commits, but it would be nice if it were done automatically on a bi-weekly basis if and only if there have been changes. Just a suggestion. :) GC On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr wrote: Le 22/07/2012 22:30, Gregory

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi Philippe, Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Now that I have a somewhat automated build process it would be nice to have some feedback on the result. Sure. I tried to use libobjc2, and did a preliminary debianization, but ran into linking errors when using gcc 4.7 and didn't

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Hi and thanks for testing Not at all. On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:42:05PM +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: Now that I have a somewhat automated build process it would be nice to have some feedback on the

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com writes: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: [snip] This could be a problem : I 'simplified' gnustep-back package and kept only the cairo backend... What does 'defaults read NSGlobalDomain' gives you ? defaults read NSGlobalDomain Sorry, the

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Are the packages built periodically? On Sunday, July 22, 2012, Philippe Roussel wrote: Hi all, Now that I have a somewhat automated build process it would be nice to have some feedback on the result. I tried to use libobjc2, and did a preliminary debianization, but ran into linking errors

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

The reason I ask is because I have been thinking of a repo which automatically builds packages for gnustep every week or every few days do that we would be in control of our packages and also people who prefer package managers could keep up to date more easily. GC On Sunday, July 22, 2012,

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Le 22/07/2012 22:20, Csanyi Pal a écrit : Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com writes: Philippe Roussel p.o.rous...@free.fr writes: [snip] This could be a problem : I 'simplified' gnustep-back package and kept only the cairo backend... What does 'defaults read NSGlobalDomain' gives you ?

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages

Hi Stefan, Le 22/07/2012 23:33, Stefan Bidi a écrit : Something seems messed up with your packages. They seem to depend on something that bring the debian version of gnustep with it. This is what I got when I did 'apt-get install addressmanager.app gorm.app': The following extra packages