On 24/06/2011, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Le 2011-06-24 14:34, Manfred A. Reiter a écrit :
Hi Uwe,
Ich bin z.Zt. in Urlaub, melde mich danach. ;-) ... Sollten uns dann
persönlich sehen.
LG
## Manfred - (android) mobil - please excuse typos
Am 24.06.2011 15:40 schrieb Uwe
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
4. It is incorrect to presume that Font Embedding will not be in ODF 1.3
or any other. While font embedding did not make the feature cut in the
prioritization for ODF 1.2, that does not mean it can't be resurrected.
It is early days for ODF 1.3, which is
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
plino pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
In any case, if LibreOffice's goal is to be a suite that stands
behind the ODF format then it should review what it promises. If it
can't embed fonts, it can never be a replacement for MS Office.
Does MS Office embed
У суб, 25. 06 2011. у 12:34 +0200, Manfred Usselmann пише:
Does MS Office embed fonts?
It is a rarely used option, disabled by default.
To use it not breaking copyright law, you need to have a properly
licensed font. If you are using non-free font, usually you are not
allowed to redistribute
Le Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:34:29 +0200,
Manfred Usselmann usselman...@icg-online.de a écrit :
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
plino pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
In any case, if LibreOffice's goal is to be a suite that stands
behind the ODF format then it should review what it promises.
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:06:17 -0400
Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Charles H. Schultz has informed us that the OASIS group has no
intention of embedding fonts for v.1.2, 1.3 or any future versions,
so getting the same type of fidelity from a LibreOffice Reader will
not be possible. In this
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:21:34 +0200
Goran Rakic gra...@devbase.net wrote:
У пет, 24. 06 2011. у 14:03 -0500, Robert Derman пише:
As long as ODF has this inherent limitation it WILL NEVER SUCCEED
as a universal document exchange format!!!
Different formats exists with different goals.
http://snappdapp.diamondstorepharmacy.net/?camp=rubern
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final versions
of text (and maybe other office) documents.
I'd say yes if they are likely to be printed on paper, no if it is only
likely to be read from a screen. Snag is desktop office software originates
from a time
On 25 June 2011 10:02, timofonic timofonic timofo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Nuno J. Silva nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt
wrote:
On 2011-06-24, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marc Paré wrote:
if we were to promote a quick and dirty
LibreOffice Reader, very much like the Adobe
Can we ban this guy
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Marius Popa marius.mar...@gmail.comwrote:
http://snappdapp.diamondstorepharmacy.net/?camp=rubern
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more:
On 25 June 2011 13:37, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote:
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final
versions
of text (and maybe other office) documents.
I'd say yes if they are likely to be
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Nuno J. Silva nunojsi...@ist.utl.ptwrote:
On 2011-06-24, Robert Derman wrote:
Varun Mittal wrote:
I personally feel we have more important set of priorities than
diversifying
right now into PDF reader. Also no point inventing the wheel again when
there
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
No it doesn't.
Of course it does. Maybe you don't use it or don't know how to do it. But
don't say it doesn't.
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
But I think we're also missing the point if -let's say
we were to design a brand new office file format that embeds or
Le Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT),
plino pedl...@gmail.com a écrit :
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
No it doesn't.
Of course it does. Maybe you don't use it or don't know how to do
it. But don't say it doesn't.
So are you saying your word documents embed fonts on a daily basis?
The reason for the periodic Committee Drafts is to have reasonably-stable
feature specifications that implementers can start on and confirm the
specification of before we do the work to produce the final stable
specification (a Committee Specification) that then goes forward as a Candidate
Hi Dennis
Le 2011-06-25 12:40, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
The reason for the periodic Committee Drafts is to have reasonably-stable
feature specifications that implementers can start on and confirm the
specification of before we do the work to produce the final stable
specification (a
On 2011-06-25, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Le 2011-06-24 13:13, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
So, let me state and restate this : ODF will not embed fonts in the
1.2, 1.3, nor in the future, because the format is not meant to focus on
faithful layout rendering.
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
My Windows 7 C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Reader 10.0\ folder is 181 MB.
Where do you get the 6 GB?
I simply right clicked on the folder that contains adobe reader 9 and
nothing else, the rest of the Adobe products are in a folder one level
up that also contains
On 06/25/2011 02:09 PM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2011-06-25, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
The problem is that the research I've been doing about this subject has
been leading me to the position that LibO/OOo is not going to implement
it because it must be implemented in ODF, and because ODF won't
On 2011-06-25, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/25/2011 02:09 PM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
I see font embedding as a way to make interoperation easier, and not to
achieve faithful representation. I think a major goal is to have ODF
being used on several platforms, and available fonts differ
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2011-06-25, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/25/2011 02:09 PM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
I see font embedding as a way to make interoperation easier, and not to
achieve faithful representation. I think a major goal is to have ODF
being used on several
Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-06-24 18:01, Nuno J. Silva a écrit :
On 2011-06-24, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-06-24 13:13, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hello,
Le Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:48:54 -0700 (PDT),
plinopedl...@gmail.com a écrit :
I really hope that revision 1.2 allows for font embedding in
У суб, 25. 06 2011. у 15:23 -0500, Robert Derman пише:
I think it would be best if restricted fonts were simply Grayed out
in the font listing and LO simply refused to use them in any way.
Let us try not to repeat everything said before here:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote:
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final
versions
of text (and maybe other office) documents.
I'd say yes if they are likely to
I dont thinks thats normal somehow, i have been using Adobe Reader for years
and have NEVER had it come past 200MB.
Back to discussion, what's with all the PDF hate. It serves a very good
purpose a standard, editable document that shows up exactly how you want it
WHEREVER you are and whatever OS
+1 although it is about fidelity too, especially in things like presentations.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 10:27
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Font Embedding in ODF (was
A working implementation would be great, although a working specification would
be better, since the ODF can consider that while others test it for
implementation. And if you want to build it into a LibreOffice as an extended
use of the format, all the better, but you need to be prepared for
All right, let's put a stake through the heart of this puppy.
I just created three documents. One is pretty large so I put them at Windows
SkyDrive:
https://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=33894f6489994ba7resid=33894F6489994BA7!371
1. A Microsoft Word 2010 1-page document with a small image
Hi Dennis.
On 26/06/11 13:53, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
All right, let's put a stake through the heart of this puppy.
I just created three documents. One is pretty large so I put them at Windows
SkyDrive:
https://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=33894f6489994ba7resid=33894F6489994BA7!371
30 matches
Mail list logo
