Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [opendaylight-dev] Sonar, JaCoCo coverage and PowerMock

[Michael Vorburger]

More of a general FYI than a comment on your particular project's already
existing use of PowerMock: We're trying to write new tests without using
PowerMock, as much as possible, and there has been some work done e.g. by
Stephen to actively convert existing PowerMock-based tests to without. Not
saying this is a general rule, just explaining why e.g. myself I'm focusing
more on new infrastructure for end2end component tests, and intro. that in
netvirt & genius, than being particular concerned about this issue related
to PowerMock. Just FYI.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Colin Dixon  wrote:

> I think we'd be happy to take code coverage from PowerMock if somebody can
> show us how to get it working.
>
> --Colin
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Konstantin Blagov -X (kblagov - PANTHEON
> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)  wrote:
>
>> Please see my comment to https://bugs.opendaylight.org/
>> show_bug.cgi?id=4941 , there's a link and GBP's  particular issue.
>>
>> Konstantin Blagov
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Varga [mailto:n...@hq.sk]
>> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 4:54 PM
>> To: Konstantin Blagov -X (kblagov - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco);
>> d...@lists.opendaylight.org
>> Cc: discuss@lists.opendaylight.org; integration-dev@lists.opendayl
>> ight.org; t...@lists.opendaylight.org
>> Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Sonar, JaCoCo coverage and PowerMock
>>
>> On 10/07/2016 09:21 AM, Konstantin Blagov -X (kblagov - PANTHEON
>> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
>> > I cannot tell exactly when this problem has started, nor if it is just
>> > conflicting versions of JaCoCo and PowerMock (at least PowerMock
>> > states that incompatibility with JaCoCo was fixed in Dec 2015)
>>
>> Do you have a reference issue or a link?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robert
>>
>> ___
>> dev mailing list
>> d...@lists.opendaylight.org
>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>
>
> ___
> dev mailing list
> d...@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>


-- 

Tx,
M.
--
Michael Vorburger  | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ =
http://vorburger.ch
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [opendaylight-dev] Sonar, JaCoCo coverage and PowerMock

[Colin Dixon]

I think we'd be happy to take code coverage from PowerMock if somebody can
show us how to get it working.

--Colin


On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Konstantin Blagov -X (kblagov - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)  wrote:

> Please see my comment to https://bugs.opendaylight.org/
> show_bug.cgi?id=4941 , there's a link and GBP's  particular issue.
>
> Konstantin Blagov
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Varga [mailto:n...@hq.sk]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 4:54 PM
> To: Konstantin Blagov -X (kblagov - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco);
> d...@lists.opendaylight.org
> Cc: discuss@lists.opendaylight.org; integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org;
> t...@lists.opendaylight.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Sonar, JaCoCo coverage and PowerMock
>
> On 10/07/2016 09:21 AM, Konstantin Blagov -X (kblagov - PANTHEON
> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> > I cannot tell exactly when this problem has started, nor if it is just
> > conflicting versions of JaCoCo and PowerMock (at least PowerMock
> > states that incompatibility with JaCoCo was fixed in Dec 2015)
>
> Do you have a reference issue or a link?
>
> Thanks,
> Robert
>
> ___
> dev mailing list
> d...@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss