[OSGeo-Discuss] 10th Jornadas de SIG Libre (Spanish FOSS4G) + 2nd International QGIS User and Developer Conference, May 2016

It is a huge pleasure for us, announcing the new dates for the upcoming 10th edition of the Spanish FOSS4G, the so called "Jornadas de SIG Libre". [1] The conference will take place in May 2016 (24th-29th), and coinciding with our 10th edition, we wanted to prepare something special,

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4GNA - Someone is watching you :-o

I also find it good to ask project leads to pass on announcements of this nature to their user lists ( more reach the better ). On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:10 AM Steven Feldman wrote: > +1,000,000 to what Paul has said > > I also passed the FOSS4G 2013 list (which included

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4GNA - Someone is watching you :-o

+1,000,000 to what Paul has said I also passed the FOSS4G 2013 list (which included names for 2011 and previous FOSSS4Gs) to the 2014 team in the spirit of fraternal support to future FOSS4Gs, I believe that was the right thing to do even though we neglected to have specific opt in/out option.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] measuring email list activity

On 17/12/2015 8:43 pm, Markus Neteler wrote: Hi Cameron, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: My gut feeling is that over the years email activity and new ideas has gradually reduced on OSGeo-Discuss email list, and gradually increased on the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4GNA - Someone is watching you :-o

Hi, I wanted to share some thoughts, because I don't want that Maxi's concerns are buried under lots +1's, that "we are just doing our best for a successful FOSS4G". Maybe Maxi's initial email was a bit strong and contained the "LocationTech" keyword ;-) I don't think anyone (and for sure not

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Privacy Policy: [was FOSS4GNA - Someone is watching you :-o]

Hi Maxi, I love the constructive research that you have started here. Email privacy was not as topical when foss4g email lists started getting collected, and tracing technologies such as mail chimp were as assessable as mail chimp is now. So we are right to retrospectively develop our policy

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] measuring email list activity

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > On 17/12/2015 8:43 pm, Markus Neteler wrote: >> >> Hi Cameron, >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Cameron Shorter >> wrote: >>> >>> My gut feeling is that over the years email

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4GNA - Someone is watching you :-o

If you've attended one FOSS4G, I think you should absolutely be on a interested-in- foss4g list for next year.  Unsubscribe if you are no longer interested. If you've attended one FOSS4G-NA, I think you should absolutely be on a interested-in-foss4gna list for next year.  Unsubscribe if you are

[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Privacy Policy: [was FOSS4GNA - Someone is watching you :-o]

Dear Gert, deal all, after a few days of discussion I would like to sum up some considerations to re-focus to subject of my first e-mail and that in my opinion should led OSGeo foundation to at least one or two argument for discussion. 1- Some FOSS4G events made use of "aggressive" marketing

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Privacy Policy: [was FOSS4GNA - Someone is watching you :-o]

Thanks for the productive discussion - some of those privacy policies seem to be website specific ( rather than for an organization as a whole ). We just are rebooting the webcom so the timing is good for a privacy discussion. It may be easier to start here and then branch out to project /