Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023

2022-01-12 Thread Massimiliano Cannata via Discuss
++1 Il gio 13 gen 2022, 07:46 Jeroen Ticheler via Discuss < discuss@lists.osgeo.org> ha scritto: > +1 Very well said Mark! > > Jeroen (fellow idiot) > > Op 13 jan. 2022 om 03:14 heeft Mark Iliffe via Discuss < > discuss@lists.osgeo.org> het volgende geschreven: > >  > Hi Everyone, > > I would

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Poll: Change FOSS4G structure to have some continuity of organization and management

2022-02-03 Thread Massimiliano Cannata via Discuss
Dear conference community, why is the community left out from this decision / discussion? The FOSS4G conference is a property of OSGeo, and therefore of the community as a whole. The conference committee has not been elected so cannot decide in representation of the community. As an OPEN

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Poll: Change FOSS4G structure to have some continuity of organization and management

2022-02-04 Thread Massimiliano Cannata via Discuss
Dear Jeroen, Thanks for your considerations. I wasn't proposing to extend the evaluation of proposals to the whole community. I understand a dedicated committee should do this (even though I believe a part of the evaluation of a proposal could be assigned by votes of the community, maybe 10%?).

[OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki access

2022-01-21 Thread Massimiliano Cannata via Discuss
Hi all, I wanted to edit a page on OSgeo wiki but I got this message: Your user needs to be merged with an LDAP-backed user. If you do not yet have an LDAP user, you will need to create one before you can continue. Any hint on how to solve it? Thanks, maxi -- *Massimiliano Cannata*

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Geospatial devroom at FOSDEM 23

2022-10-15 Thread Massimiliano Cannata via Discuss
Ciao, I'm in, let me know what is needed. Best, Maxi Il ven 14 ott 2022, 14:38 Margherita Di Leo via Discuss < discuss@lists.osgeo.org> ha scritto: > Dears, > > FOSDEM 23 launched the call for devroom at FOSDEM [1], and I would like to > propose again the geospatial devroom, if I'm not alone in