Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Mateusz Loskot wrote: ... The OSGeo Community is pretty open and there is no formal membership - everybody invloved in FOSS4G initiavites is allowed to call herself an OSGeo member. So, in the OSGeo Planet idea, everybody involved in FOSS4G is welcome to add her blog to the Planet, without any artificial requirements (post about FOSS4G or do not post at all). However, I'd limit the OSGeo Planet to people who are involved in OSGeo activities in some way (users, speakers, developers, translators, any other contributors). Just to keep some orientation to the OSGeo world. what about just Charter Members? will it be just boaring because of we the Charter Members? Lorenzo ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Lorenzo Becchi wrote: Mateusz Loskot wrote: ... The OSGeo Community is pretty open and there is no formal membership - everybody invloved in FOSS4G initiavites is allowed to call herself an OSGeo member. So, in the OSGeo Planet idea, everybody involved in FOSS4G is welcome to add her blog to the Planet, without any artificial requirements (post about FOSS4G or do not post at all). However, I'd limit the OSGeo Planet to people who are involved in OSGeo activities in some way (users, speakers, developers, translators, any other contributors). Just to keep some orientation to the OSGeo world. what about just Charter Members? will it be just boaring because of we the Charter Members? Personally, I'm not sure about that, but I'd prefer to leave that decision to the Community. Perhaps we could mark out who on the planet is a Charter Member. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Fee, James wrote: I've tried to push folks blogging to step out behind their handles and put their names out there. I think an OSGeo Planet that were to mimic the Planet Gnome would be a super idea. I'm glad to hear that. I've not pushed the issue as I've tried to be as open as possible with Planet Geospatial, Yup, this is perfectly understood. The Planet Geospatial (actually, You do) does the great job. but if I were to create a more specific planet, I would require real name and possibly even photos. Yes, would be great, so I'm silently dreaming about planet with some/more personality. I think that adds so much credibility to the community than all the handles that folks seem to use. This is one of the major goals. Setting up a planet is very easy (Use Venus, not Planet) but feel free to consider me a resource as to what I've learned and struggled on over the years with Planet Geospatial. I will. Thank you very much James. I spend almost no time managing it beyond cleaning out old feeds (probably not an issue with Planet OSGeo) and adding new feeds (hopefully there a lot of folks wanting to blog about OSGeo). Good to hear :-) I've also supposed there is not much to maintain. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Perhaps we could mark out who on the planet is a Charter Member. Charter members aren't special in any way with respect to blogging, so I don't think it is a useful distinction to make. -mpg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:46 AM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo Lorenzo Becchi wrote: Mateusz Loskot wrote: ... The OSGeo Community is pretty open and there is no formal membership - everybody invloved in FOSS4G initiavites is allowed to call herself an OSGeo member. So, in the OSGeo Planet idea, everybody involved in FOSS4G is welcome to add her blog to the Planet, without any artificial requirements (post about FOSS4G or do not post at all). However, I'd limit the OSGeo Planet to people who are involved in OSGeo activities in some way (users, speakers, developers, translators, any other contributors). Just to keep some orientation to the OSGeo world. what about just Charter Members? will it be just boaring because of we the Charter Members? Personally, I'm not sure about that, but I'd prefer to leave that decision to the Community. Perhaps we could mark out who on the planet is a Charter Member. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Lorenzo, I think this would be counter to the accepted definition of membership levels. From http://www.osgeo.org/Membership *We emphasize that the only real difference between a Member and a Charter Member is the right and responsibility to vote at the Foundation level. It is not our intent to make the Charter Members out to be some privileged class. Furthermore, the only real difference between a Member and a Participant is the self-registration on the Foundation's website. All mailing lists, projects, committees, and other Foundation activities are uniformly open and available to all friends of the Foundation.* On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Lorenzo Becchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mateusz Loskot wrote: ... The OSGeo Community is pretty open and there is no formal membership - everybody invloved in FOSS4G initiavites is allowed to call herself an OSGeo member. So, in the OSGeo Planet idea, everybody involved in FOSS4G is welcome to add her blog to the Planet, without any artificial requirements (post about FOSS4G or do not post at all). However, I'd limit the OSGeo Planet to people who are involved in OSGeo activities in some way (users, speakers, developers, translators, any other contributors). Just to keep some orientation to the OSGeo world. what about just Charter Members? will it be just boaring because of we the Charter Members? Lorenzo ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- David William Bitner ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Lorenzo, I think this would be counter to the accepted definition of membership levels. From http://www.osgeo.org/Membership *We emphasize that the only real difference between a Member and a Charter Member is the right and responsibility to vote at the Foundation level. It is not our intent to make the Charter Members out to be some privileged class. Furthermore, the only real difference between a Member and a Participant is the self-registration on the Foundation's website. All mailing lists, projects, committees, and other Foundation activities are uniformly open and available to all friends of the Foundation.* On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Lorenzo Becchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mateusz Loskot wrote: ... The OSGeo Community is pretty open and there is no formal membership - everybody invloved in FOSS4G initiavites is allowed to call herself an OSGeo member. So, in the OSGeo Planet idea, everybody involved in FOSS4G is welcome to add her blog to the Planet, without any artificial requirements (post about FOSS4G or do not post at all). However, I'd limit the OSGeo Planet to people who are involved in OSGeo activities in some way (users, speakers, developers, translators, any other contributors). Just to keep some orientation to the OSGeo world. what about just Charter Members? will it be just boaring because of we the Charter Members? Lorenzo ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- David William Bitner ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Michael P. Gerlek wrote: Perhaps we could mark out who on the planet is a Charter Member. Charter members aren't special in any way with respect to blogging, so I don't think it is a useful distinction to make. I support this opinion. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Good to hear :-) I've also supposed there is not much to maintain. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot I have not touched the daily operation of the python script since I installed the new version about a year ago. I only add and delete feeds as needed. Surprisingly very little overhead. -- James Fee TEC Inc ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 22:58 +0100, Lorenzo Becchi wrote: Michael P. Gerlek wrote: Perhaps we could mark out who on the planet is a Charter Member. Charter members aren't special in any way with respect to blogging, so I don't think it is a useful distinction to make. no problem to me, I don't have a personal blog ;-) I was targeting Chater Members not for their special status but for the reason they have been elected. Reading a little further what David suggests in Membership page[1]: Nominees for Charter Member status should meet the following criteria: - The person should have already made a contribution to open source geospatial software. - The person should be willing to put in time and effort on Foundation activities (e.g. perhaps joining committee(s), or volunteering in some other way that gets the foundation going). - Members should believe in the general goals of the Foundation. To support and promote the use of open source geospatial software in a collaborative manner. - Members selected should provide a diversity of geographic representation in the Foundation. - Members selected should provide representation of a diversity of projects. For instance, we have a strong desire to see the java tribe well represented in the Foundation. We don't want the membership dominated by folks from just one project. - Members selected should provide representation of a diversity of interests (eg. corporate, hobbyist, educational, scientific). - Members should be prepared to works constructively and positively towards the goals of the Foundation. Good teamwork skills are an asset. I think this criteria are what I would like to see represented in the blog of this community That's certainly a good criteria for selection in a blog planet, but I'm willing to bet there are more non charter members who meet those criteria than charter members. Inclusion in a planet should be on a much less formal basis imho. Tim Bowden my 2 cents Lorenzo [1] http://www.osgeo.org/membership ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Folks, I'd like to thank all for the great feedback. I collected all ideas we've discussed and put on the Wiki: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/PlanetOSGeo I've also submitted this idea to our Website Committee for comments: http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/206 Best regards -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
I like this idea as well. Landon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:31 PM To: Discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo Folks, Is there any plan or motion to setup an official OSGeo Planet? Chris developed and maintains it at http://planetosgeo.crschmidt.net/ and it gathers a number of OSGeo bloggers, so the idea works! Perhaps it's a good idea to setup (or move) Chris' work to planet.osgeo.org and make it more an official OSGeo Community thing. There is a number of well-known and popular planets around the Web: http://planet.debian.org/ http://planet.gnome.org/ http://planet.ubuntu.com/ etc. and all of them play very important role in these communities. Perhaps this subject has been discussed already, but I couldn't find anything in the archives. Any thoughts? Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss Warning: Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Jason Birch wrote: I like the idea Mateusz. Great, the gang is growing :-) I think I'd probably have to remove my blog from the list though, You're kidding, right? as I sometimes blog about proprietary software as well :) This is not a problem. IMHO, planets are about people, alive members of a community. How does this work for the other planets; do they allow wishy-washy open source proponents like me? I've monitored a couple of popular planets for a while and I'm sure there are no restrictions or strong rules of what can and what can not be posted. Once someone is added to a planet, everything he posts on his blog, is also published on the planet. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote: On 12-Feb-08, at 8:31 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Perhaps it's a good idea to setup (or move) Chris' work to planet.osgeo.org and make it more an official OSGeo Community thing. I support the idea and have often daydreamed about having a more community-centric site in addition to our main outward focused one. Highlighting blogs from Friends of OSGeo would be neat, along with other things I like: * polls * job postings * script sharing * event planning tools * more that I can't remember... Yes, Friends of OSGeo, basically that's the idea. Unfortunately I don't have the time to really give that a start and it would require support from the web committee. Regardless, setting up the planet stuff wouldn't be huge maintenance, but would still need someone keen to set it up and some support from web committee to get started. I send the proposal, so I'm willing to take care of the tech part. Where could I find details about what's the procedure of submitting new ideas or RFC to the Web Committee? You've got my vote :) Cool! -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Fawcett, David wrote: I personally like reading the OS bloggers mixed in with the proprietary bloggers along with the bloggers who write about using tools from both camps, all at planetgs.com. Yup, planetgs.com does a great job and James Fee is a pioneer in gathering geospatial people from both worlds in common place. However, my personal feeling is that there is a lot or too much of anonymity on the Planet Geospatial, but communities are not formed by anonymous individuals. When I look at the list of aggregated blogs, I hardly can identify who is hiding behind all those names. If you check the list of members of http://planet.debian.org/ http://planet.ubuntu.com/ http://planet.gnome.org/ you see *only* and *real* names of people. IMHO, this is a very important difference for how community is visible to the world. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
I've tried to push folks blogging to step out behind their handles and put their names out there. I think an OSGeo Planet that were to mimic the Planet Gnome would be a super idea. I've not pushed the issue as I've tried to be as open as possible with Planet Geospatial, but if I were to create a more specific planet, I would require real name and possibly even photos. I think that adds so much credibility to the community than all the handles that folks seem to use. Setting up a planet is very easy (Use Venus, not Planet) but feel free to consider me a resource as to what I've learned and struggled on over the years with Planet Geospatial. I spend almost no time managing it beyond cleaning out old feeds (probably not an issue with Planet OSGeo) and adding new feeds (hopefully there a lot of folks wanting to blog about OSGeo). James Fee TEC Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:03 PM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo Fawcett, David wrote: I personally like reading the OS bloggers mixed in with the proprietary bloggers along with the bloggers who write about using tools from both camps, all at planetgs.com. Yup, planetgs.com does a great job and James Fee is a pioneer in gathering geospatial people from both worlds in common place. However, my personal feeling is that there is a lot or too much of anonymity on the Planet Geospatial, but communities are not formed by anonymous individuals. When I look at the list of aggregated blogs, I hardly can identify who is hiding behind all those names. If you check the list of members of http://planet.debian.org/ http://planet.ubuntu.com/ http://planet.gnome.org/ you see *only* and *real* names of people. IMHO, this is a very important difference for how community is visible to the world. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
I'd be willing to shed the Sunburned Surveyor nickname for my real name on my OpenJUMP blog for OSGeo Planet if asked. Landon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fee, James Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 2:45 PM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo I've tried to push folks blogging to step out behind their handles and put their names out there. I think an OSGeo Planet that were to mimic the Planet Gnome would be a super idea. I've not pushed the issue as I've tried to be as open as possible with Planet Geospatial, but if I were to create a more specific planet, I would require real name and possibly even photos. I think that adds so much credibility to the community than all the handles that folks seem to use. Setting up a planet is very easy (Use Venus, not Planet) but feel free to consider me a resource as to what I've learned and struggled on over the years with Planet Geospatial. I spend almost no time managing it beyond cleaning out old feeds (probably not an issue with Planet OSGeo) and adding new feeds (hopefully there a lot of folks wanting to blog about OSGeo). James Fee TEC Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:03 PM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo Fawcett, David wrote: I personally like reading the OS bloggers mixed in with the proprietary bloggers along with the bloggers who write about using tools from both camps, all at planetgs.com. Yup, planetgs.com does a great job and James Fee is a pioneer in gathering geospatial people from both worlds in common place. However, my personal feeling is that there is a lot or too much of anonymity on the Planet Geospatial, but communities are not formed by anonymous individuals. When I look at the list of aggregated blogs, I hardly can identify who is hiding behind all those names. If you check the list of members of http://planet.debian.org/ http://planet.ubuntu.com/ http://planet.gnome.org/ you see *only* and *real* names of people. IMHO, this is a very important difference for how community is visible to the world. Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss Warning: Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
I like the idea and would like to provide occasional content. Is it possible for me as a blogger to categorize my entries and for planet.osgeo to only take the OSGeo related entries I consider worthy? This feature should improve signal to noise ratio. Or for uses to filter out authors or categories? Mateusz Loskot wrote: Folks, Is there any plan or motion to setup an official OSGeo Planet? Chris developed and maintains it at http://planetosgeo.crschmidt.net/ and it gathers a number of OSGeo bloggers, so the idea works! Perhaps it's a good idea to setup (or move) Chris' work to planet.osgeo.org and make it more an official OSGeo Community thing. There is a number of well-known and popular planets around the Web: http://planet.debian.org/ http://planet.gnome.org/ http://planet.ubuntu.com/ etc. and all of them play very important role in these communities. Perhaps this subject has been discussed already, but I couldn't find anything in the archives. Any thoughts? Cheers -- Cameron Shorter Geospatial Systems Architect Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050 Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254 Think Globally, Fix Locally Commercial Support for Geospatial Open Source Solutions http://www.lisasoft.com/LISAsoft/SupportedProducts.html ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Me too. Some time I feel like blogging. Cameron Shorter wrote: I like the idea and would like to provide occasional content. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
On 13-Feb-08, at 3:48 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: Is it possible for me as a blogger to categorize my entries and for planet.osgeo to only take the OSGeo related entries I consider worthy? This feature should improve signal to noise ratio. I assume you could modify your outgoing feed to accept a filter? Then the subscribed URL would reflect it. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Most modern blogging platforms support RSS feeds for categories/tags out of the box. Wordpress and Wordpress.com do it by appending /feed/ to the end of the category url. For example if you wanted to subscribe to only OSGeo posts from my blog, you'd just subscribe to: feed://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/category/open-source/open-source-geospatial-foundation/feed There isn't really anything complicated about it. You could also just subscribe to all open source posts via: feed://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/category/open-source/feed/ It is just that simple. Some folks in PlanetGS provide only category feeds. I know Typepad can't do this and blogger couldn't before (not sure about that anymore). But most folks should be migrating to Wordpress anyway for their blogging so this really isn't too much of an issue. James Fee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) Sent: Wed 2/13/2008 5:59 PM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo On 13-Feb-08, at 3:48 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: Is it possible for me as a blogger to categorize my entries and for planet.osgeo to only take the OSGeo related entries I consider worthy? This feature should improve signal to noise ratio. I assume you could modify your outgoing feed to accept a filter? Then the subscribed URL would reflect it. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
I guess I'm assuming that Mateusz talked to Christopher before posting this? Anyway, I'd certainly welcome this kind of service. If there is community buy-in and Christopher isn't interested in setting it up, I'd be happy to install it on osgeo2. I've worked with it a bit for an unrelated project, and it's really easy to deal with in its basic configuration, even to the extent of pulling its subscription list from an external (Google Docs, etc) CSV file. If there's enough interest on this list, then let's pull it over to WebCom for discussion of details and take care of it from there. Jason From: Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo Regardless, setting up the planet stuff wouldn't be huge maintenance, but would still need someone keen to set it up and some support from web committee to get started. winmail.dat___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
On 12-Feb-08, at 8:31 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Perhaps it's a good idea to setup (or move) Chris' work to planet.osgeo.org and make it more an official OSGeo Community thing. I support the idea and have often daydreamed about having a more community-centric site in addition to our main outward focused one. Highlighting blogs from Friends of OSGeo would be neat, along with other things I like: * polls * job postings * script sharing * event planning tools * more that I can't remember... Unfortunately I don't have the time to really give that a start and it would require support from the web committee. Regardless, setting up the planet stuff wouldn't be huge maintenance, but would still need someone keen to set it up and some support from web committee to get started. You've got my vote :) Tyler ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
I like the idea Mateusz. I think I'd probably have to remove my blog from the list though, as I sometimes blog about proprietary software as well :) How does this work for the other planets; do they allow wishy-washy open source proponents like me? Jason From: Mateusz Loskot Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo Perhaps it's a good idea to setup (or move) Chris' work to planet.osgeo.org and make it more an official OSGeo Community thing. winmail.dat___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
