Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

Le 6 mars 2016 à 18:40, Jody Garnett a écrit : > It may be worth asking the recent Paris code sprint participants "how it > went" in a separate email thread. For information, i've began to gather feedbacks from participants here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Paris_Code_Sprint_2016_:_Feedback

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 03:40:29PM +, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote: > The world needs a more peaceful approach to the future. Well said ! The idea of working 24h/day is what keeps me away from code sprints. But when there's a chance to have fun and eat togheter, taking a break from work,

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints Patrick, as others have explained, the code or community sprints are indeed an essential part of open source projects - with developers from all over the globe, this is the opportunity to get together and get some of the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

our methods for achieving our common goal of richer ^commons.^ -p > > > > From: Ian Turton [mailto:ijtur...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2016 7:58 AM > To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) > Cc: Andrea Aime; discuss@lists.osgeo.org > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Boar

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

gt;> >> -Patrick >> >> >> >> *From:* andrea.a...@gmail.com [mailto:andrea.a...@gmail.com] *On Behalf >> Of *Andrea Aime >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 6, 2016 6:32 AM >> *To:* Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) >> *Cc:* Ian Turton; discuss@lists.osgeo.org >&g

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

ail.com [mailto:andrea.a...@gmail.com] *On Behalf > Of *Andrea Aime > *Sent:* Sunday, March 6, 2016 6:32 AM > *To:* Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) > *Cc:* Ian Turton; discuss@lists.osgeo.org > *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints > > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

AM To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) Cc: Ian Turton; discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) <patrick.ho...@nasa.gov<mailto:patrick.ho...@nasa.gov>> wrote: It appears to me that even these more

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) < patrick.ho...@nasa.gov> wrote: > It appears to me that even these more-substantial-than-hackathons sprints > do not reflect the typical work environment for code development. I will > suggest that requires more of the 'deep thought'

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

On Behalf Of Dirk Frigne Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2016 5:27 AM To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org> Cc: managementsupp...@geosparc.com<mailto:managementsupp...@geosparc.com> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints Patrick, You point to an interest

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

Europa Challenge. > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > > > *From:*Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of > > *dirk frigne > > > > *Sent:*Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:23 AM >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

enge. > > > > Kind regards, > > -Patrick > > > > *From:*Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of > *dirk frigne > > *Sent:*Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:23 AM > > *To:*discuss@lists.osgeo.org > > *Cc:*managementsupp...@dfc.be

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

winners of the Europa Challenge. Kind regards, -Patrick From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of dirk frigne Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:23 AM To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org Cc: managementsupp...@dfc.be Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints Maxi, I

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

Maxi, I think we can solve that concern by divide the budget in 2 parts: Assumption that we know already the really strategic code sprints for 2016. (like the FOSS4G codes sprint in Bonn) >From past years the board can make a good assumption what the budget for the strategic code sprints should

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

h Raghavan Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 10:25 PM > To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints > > Hi Mike, > > I agree with you. My suggestion to spread out the code sprint was only to > ensure that the community has

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

0) 269-2788 (cell) > > -Original Message- > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of > Venkatesh Raghavan > Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 10:25 PM > To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints > > Hi Mi

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

Dear all, the fact that made me rise this discussion is: - we are facing more and more sprint code support requests (really really great) - we do have limited budget (we may not be able to support all the requests) So, how to prevent, for example, that a request in September for a very strategic

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) > wrote: > > For my two-pence, which won't even get you a cup of chai in Mumbai Correct. The current going rate is about 15¢ or 10p. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesh Raghavan Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 10:25 PM To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints Hi Mike, I agree with you. My suggestion to spread out the code sprint was only to ensure

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

Hi Mike, I agree with you. My suggestion to spread out the code sprint was only to ensure that the community has some idea some idea when the sprint could be expected and when/how to request OSGeo Foundation for support. I would like to see more an more code sprints (also incubation sprints

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

On 20 February 2016 at 01:07, Massimiliano Cannata < massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote: > With this mail I would personally like to ask a few questions the > different communities: > > - who is intended to present a fund request for sprint code in 2016. This > will give an idea of the number

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

All, I don't think there is a reason to have code sprints coordinate their times to spread them out over the year. They should run when they need to run. We don't have a cash flow issue that would require this. And for the Paris Code Sprint, although a request was made, it does not appear at

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

, February 21, 2016 6:41 PM To: Venkatesh Raghavan; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints Venka, I’m just suggesting that it be included under “Project Plans” here https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Paris_Code_Sprint_2016 Just asking that one line ‘Europa Challenge

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

m: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesh Raghavan Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:35 PM To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints Dear All, Considering OSGeo budget for 2016, I think, it could be possible to supp

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesh Raghavan Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:35 PM To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints Dear All, Considering OSGeo budget for 2016, I think, it could be possible to support 3 or 4 Code Sprints at similar sponsors

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

] On Behalf Of Venkatesh Raghavan Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:35 PM To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints Dear All, Considering OSGeo budget for 2016, I think, it could be possible to support 3 or 4 Code Sprints at similar sponsorship

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

Dear All, Considering OSGeo budget for 2016, I think, it could be possible to support 3 or 4 Code Sprints at similar sponsorship levels for each sprint as in the past. I would like to propose to have code spread across three or four periods across the year e.g Jan-March, April-June, July-Sept,