On 1/25/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMO:
>
>
> Sorry for the inflamatory subject heading. I'm hoping to get a few bites
> with my fishing...
>
>
>
> I'm currently reviewing a high level government strategy paper (in draft)
> and intend submitting a formal response.
>
> I'd
Software quality is a difficult concept to measure so that it can be
factored into purchasing decisions and budgets. How do you compare the
quality of two different projects?
I assume the authors of the paper you are reviewing are drawing upon
Quality processes like ISO 9001, or Quality Contro
IMO:
Thanks Ivan,
Agreed.
While government can certainly incubate, sponsor and contribute to
projects. My personal opinion is that they are better run by 'the
community'.
If the project is good enough, it should get sufficient supporters and
hopefully be picked up by a 'central authority' li
IMO:
Thanks for the comments Michael,
As I said in my post, I was being deliberately provocative with choice of
subject heading.
Yes it is certainly possible that I've missed the intent of the author's
comments. It is only a small portion of an excellent document.
However, I also have a v
Bruce,
That sounds like removing the "F" from FOSS or should I say, that is a
bazaar inside a cathedral. :)
Seriously now, IMHO, as an FOSS contributor and a commercial software
developer that uses FOSS, I believe that there is a complicated process
of getting to the point to embrace a FOSS
2008/1/25, Wilfred L. Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The document I prepared in response to your inquiry, outlining
WTH?
--
Paulo Marcondes = PU1/PU2PIX
-22.915 -42.224 = GG86jc
http://www.kombato.org - Ciência da Proteção
___
Discuss mailing list
Discu
The document I prepared in response to your inquiry, outlining
intentional and explicit compromises and undermining "capabilities" of
criminal gang infiltrated system design was just destroyed, as is the
majority of the memory and data on the pda device, as it was
explicitly attacked by the threats
Bruce-
Without having seen the sentences on either side of the one you quote, I
think I'd argue that the author is not wrong in his statement: is not
what we here call a PSC, and indeed the OSGeo Foundation itself, an
embodiment of "some form of central authority"?
..which is not to say your ow
