On May 2, 2016 12:11:46 AM EDT, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>Incidentally, besides hearing thoughts from others, I'm not clear in
>our
>new project management where is the best place to write down this idea
>so that it gets discussed and can then be something our research and
>design folks can consider and
On 02/05/2016 08:52, Jacob Chapman wrote:
> Yes. I think this is a great idea. By making it opt-in we can encourage
> people to be a sustaining member without rejecting the people who are
> used to one-time-only donations.
Indeed, that would allow projects to not need to keep a second donation
pla
This makes sense to me. Offering a few options rather than just one can
change people's decision frame from "shall I do this?" (yes vs. no) to
"how shall I do this?" (option 1 vs. option 2. vs none of the above).
Offering a one-time option can allow people to try engaging without
making more of a
On 05/02/2016 01:27 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> This makes sense to me. Offering a few options rather than just one can
> change people's decision frame from "shall I do this?" (yes vs. no) to
> "how shall I do this?" (option 1 vs. option 2. vs none of the above).
> Offering a one-time option c
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Michael Siepmann
wrote:
On 05/01/2016 10:11 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
So, I learned from in research in traditional fundraising this
interesting bit:
This pertains to fundraisers wanting to get people to sign up as
ongoing
members where they donate monthly or annu
On 05/02/2016 02:34 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Michael Siepmann
> wrote:
>> On 05/01/2016 10:11 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>> So, I learned from in research in traditional fundraising this
>>> interesting bit:
>>>
>>> This pertains to fundraisers wanting to get people