wow, a page recompile? first I heard that one. hey, sometimes evils
can't be avoided, eh? Like driving on the 400 at 5pm, sometimes you
just have to. IIRC, the ability to reference client vars in structure
notation was introduced in CF6. So in CF5, you are out of luck so to
speak. Are you
Mischa, you say, Instantiating application.cfc does not throw an error, but
also doesn't set my application vars :(
Just to be clear, are you just instantiating it (such as with CFObject or
CreateObject)? Or are you also invoking a method (after one of the above, or
using CFINVOKE)? While the
Charlie, thanks for the URL but I already have authorization from the USPS,
it's just that after getting deeper into the documentation and the kit that
they send you, you realize that the solution is for ASP or VB. I hope that
makes a little more sense.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Title: Message
No,
unfortunately it won't work...that's why the GetClientVariablesList() existed in
5 and previous versionsif you could use it as a structure you would be able
to do StructKeyList().
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Do you by any chance know of a good code example I could follow. The
one on livedocs didnt look a very good one. Many thx for the reply.
Dusty
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:50
PM
To:
I have a not-so good example in the
Tardis sample app.
http://www.illumineti.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=catcatid=28B26753-C09F-25C5-832AE045709158C1
The thing is you can do whatever you
want with the actual login. The cflogin framework just gives you things
to use for setting/getting roles, etc.
Many thanks for the replies and I will dive in and see what I can do
with it. Regards to all.
Dusty
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:28
PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] login
yeah, i use it as well... never had any issues with it. On 5/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you care for it? I know that
it isn't a wizard type of solution, but it gives you a framework
to build on.
Shawn Gorrell
Web Development Applications Architect
Federal
We do this we built our own login.
isAuthorized(one,two;three)
This checks if someone has roles
permission one and two or they can have just
permission three. That multi-layered approach is much more flexible.
We do other things also, but that is what I was referring to in my last
