OTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Haygood
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:14 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform
I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory (which
s
OTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Haygood
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:14 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org <mailto:discussion@acfug.org>
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform
I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can
g.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform
I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory
space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory
(which
should allow more memory for the JVM instance)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Haygood
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:14 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform
I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows app
AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform
I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory (which
should allow more memory for the JVM instance)
-Original Message-
ubject
Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform
Just remember if you pick Sun you cant run a supported copy of CF on
the x86 architecture. You have to run Sparc on Solaris.
On 11/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:34 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform
As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option. On
windows & linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance
is about 1.25GB. That number goe
As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option. On
windows & linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance
is about 1.25GB. That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris. I'm not
going to get into the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the
performance differe
Just remember if you pick Sun you cant run a supported copy of CF on
the x86 architecture. You have to run Sparc on Solaris.
On 11/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option. On
windows & linux the max amount of memory ava
For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server. Last year we
decided to try Linux (Ubuntu). Coldfusion works better with Debian base
linux, for me anyway. Been loving cf on linux ever since.
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:
> I am looking at new opportunities and though
My employer uses a mixture of Windows 2000 AS and Windows Server 2003 to serve
from, though we customize it a bit and run it on top of Java 5.0 (which has
significant performance increases from the bundled Java, even on older server
hardware).
From: [EMAIL PROT
11 matches
Mail list logo
