t: Monday, August 17, 2009 8:15 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Learning a ColdFusion Framework: Update
Thanks Charlie for the clarifications!
I'm sure that I don't have the perspective to do a rigorous evaluation of
ColdBox or any framework for that matte
eople at
BellSouth. In the old days, my development team used CF 1.5 for a prototype
back in 1996, and we used jrun for a while, too!
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 6:53 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Di
Hey Clarke, I caught your comment here, that
> I was originally going to start with ColdBox to learn a ColdFusion
framework. But, I quickly got lost in the complexity. To really use ColdBox,
you
> end up needing to know Coldspring and Transfer. But, since each of those
has a learning curve,
For those of you who are interested in how I'm learning CFWheels, I've added
a jump page to organize my blog posts.
http://www.resultantsys.com/index.php/cfwheels
Please let me know what you think!
Clarke
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Clarke Bishop
Sen
Clarke,
I used to be on the mailing list for CF Wheels in earlier versions. It has
a solid approach.
Now, one of your statements about your selection of a framework mentions
that Transfer or Reactor was a learning curve point. My warning to you is
that in the built in model syntax of CF Wheels,
