There is a good link off of fortas post mentioned above on what it
means. Its very thorough.
http://www.hecker.org/mozilla/adobe-mozilla-and-tamarin
On 11/8/06, Precia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming back to the Flash scripting engine code. What's the big
picture with this? What could this
This article pretty much sums it up what this provide for Mozilla:http://www.hecker.org/mozilla/adobe-mozilla-and-tamarinTeddy
On 11/8/06, Precia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming back to the Flash scripting engine code.What's the bigpicture with this?What could this do in the Mozilla
Here's my read on it.
In a nutshell, it will make Mozilla's Javascript processing engine a lot
faster (I'd be willing to bet considerably faster than IE 7, although I
admit that's purely personal conjecture). While it wouldn't be extremely
difficult for the Mozilla project to develop an open
. I do this in
the code I have for the UGTV list/search interface.
/charlie
http://www.carehart.org/blog/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Ajas MohammedSent: Monday, October 16, 2006 3:20
PMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re:
PLZ DISREGARD
this in
the code I have for the UGTV list/search interface.
/charlie
http://www.carehart.org/blog/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ajas MohammedSent: Monday, October 16, 2006 3:20
PMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re:
PLZ DISREGARD PREV MAIL..1.Query
No, I do not have cfqueryparam in any of my queries. For question no. 2, I have heard of verity but I am not sure what it does and if thats what is needed for performing search (like google).Thanks.
On 10/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For
number 1: do you have a
MohammedSent:
Monday, October 16, 2006 10:37 AMTo:
discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: PLZ DISREGARD
PREV MAIL..1.Query Caching 2.Implementing search
FeatureNo, I do not have cfqueryparam in any of
my queries. For question no. 2, I have heard of verity but I am
@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: PLZ DISREGARD
PREV MAIL..1.Query Caching 2.Implementing search
FeatureNo, I do not have cfqueryparam in any of
my queries. For question no. 2, I have heard of verity but I am not sure what
it does and if thats what is needed for performing search
.
/charlie
http://www.carehart.org/blog/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Charlie ArehartSent: Monday, October 16, 2006
11:13 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG
Discuss] Re: PLZ DISREGARD PREV MAIL..1.Query Caching 2.Implementing
search Feature
Ajas, I
: [ACFUG
Discuss] Re: PLZ DISREGARD PREV MAIL..1.Query Caching 2.Implementing
search Feature
Ajas, I think you confused people with the subject saying
please disregard previous email.
As for your challenge, your challenge isn't with caching
but simplythat you needthe next or previous pages
Please feel free to ask questions, too. We ACFUGers live for answering questions. :)
Precia
On 10/12/06, Ajas, Mohammed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone, Before I start let me introduce myself. My name is Ajas Mohammed, currently working as Web Developer (ColdFusion, SQL Server) in
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
From: Precia
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006
3:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re:
[ACFUG Announce] Web Application Construction Kit (WACK) Study Group starts
next week
Please feel free to ask questions, too. We ACFUGers
"Dean H. Saxe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This should go to the discussion list (and I redirected it there).I apologize, this is my first attempt at trying to ask a question to the ACFUG and I just replied to an email that I received.Is the column set to allow nulls? If not, that's your
Do
this:
mySmallDateField = NULLIF(LTRIM(RTRIM(whateverValueWasPassed)),
'')
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jeff HowardSent:
Thursday, September 28, 2006 3:00 PMTo:
discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re
d.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeff Howard
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 3:00 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: [ACFUG Community] Quick (and hopefully
simple) question about updating a SQL Server table
Dean H. Saxe [EM
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Howard
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 3:00 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: [ACFUG Community] Quick (and
hopefully simple) question about updating a SQL Server table
Dean H. Saxe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
;", set it to NULL instead. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Howard Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 3:00 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: [ACFUG Community] Quick (and hopefully simple) question about updating a SQL Server tab
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff HowardSent: Thursday, September 28, 2006
3:52 PMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG
Discuss] Re: [ACFUG Community] Quick (and hopefully simple) question about
updating a SQL Server table
That's what I did. Thanks.
UPDATETableNameSET
CFIF FORM.VendorPOAmt6 IS N
=cf_sql_float
maxlength=20 value=#FORM.Money#,
CFELSE
Money=
NULL,
/CFIF
etc.
etc.
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Jeff HowardSent: Thursday, September 28, 2006
3:52 PMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject:
Re: [ACFUG
Discuss] Re: [ACFUG Community] Quick
Thanks Charlie for your well-researched
reply. (BTW Im replying to you ONLY via ACFUG as that is where I know
you from. How are you doing? Well Im sure. Im in LA now,
and CF-wise its lonely out here. There is NO LACFUG (that I have found
at least, PLEASE correct me if I am wrong.)
Yes,
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, September 17,
2006 8:06 PMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG
Discuss] RE: [sdcfug-d] difference between CGI._http_host and
CGI.server_name
Thanks Charlie for your
well-researched reply. (BTW Im replying to you ONLY via ACFUG as that is where
I know
, September 17, 2006
6:40 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
[sdcfug-d] difference between CGI._http_host and CGI.server_name
Well your finding would
be more consistent with what the http specs (which as I noted said it should
include the port). And you're using the built
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 8:06 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: [sdcfug-d] difference between
CGI._http_host and CGI.server_name
Thanks Charlie for your well-researched reply. (BTW I’m replying to
you ONLY via
: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: [sdcfug-d] difference between
CGI._http_host and CGI.server_name
Charlie,
That may be your browser removing the default port. Try telnet to localhost
port 80. Then try:
GET /index.cfm HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:80
Alternatively, use Paros (www.parosproxy.org) and check
Thanks. And um, just for the fun factor, let me tell you what that's running on::Apple Dual G5 X Serve with 8 GB RAM, Blue Dragon 6.2, Apache 1.3 and MySQL 4.1.13 _ Derrick Peavy Sales and Web Services Universal Advertising Phone: 404-786-5036 Fax: 404-370-0470
The final solution was/is much simpler. However, there is still a query speed advantage with PHP. A colleague ran the same queries, on the same model machine, using the same MySQL DB, and MySQL version, only difference was PHP and the query times were much, much faster. How much? Well, after
On 9/8/06, Derrick Peavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0.5MS). You can see the CF page here:
http://www.universaladvertising.com/atest.cfm
That page indicates results for my query in 0009. ms the first
time around and .0030 milliseconds for subsequent requests.pretty
freakin fast.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006
10:41 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available
channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests
SeeFusion recommended reducing the thread count by 80%? That would choke most application servers I know.Teddy
-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
For more info, see
discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Well using SeeFusion
showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP
TIME!
What was more
important?
4 hours between 1-2
minute lock ups, or
2 hours between 40
minute lock ups?
I think I did the only
logic
-8851
Fax 770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
From: Teddy Payne
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006
10:41 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available
It depends on the power of the box to handle the performance of each thread. If the requests are heavy every time, more power by reducing threads is indeed a band-aid. What Doug was alluding to was that the pages need to be fixed and not the thread count.
Teddy
Office 770-974-8851
Fax 770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006
11:21 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
More importantly, what pages does
SeeFusion note
@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
SeeFusion recommended reducing the thread count by 80%? That
would choke most application servers I know.
Teddy
-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http
AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as running during your
lockups?
If you terminate the execution of those threads (using SeeFusion), is the
server able to handle requests normally
,
Motorcyclecarbs.com,
Inc.
4292 Country Garden
Walk NW
Kennesaw,
Ga. 30152
Office 770-974-8851
Fax 770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
From: Douglas Knudsen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006
11:47 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN
29, 2006
1:03 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
In the past thread termination (in
SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from.
I guess I could do a stack trace if
someone told me what and how to do it.
Robert P. Reil
Managing
, 2006 1:18 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Is it Robertday (er, Friday) already? ;-)
-
dhs
On August 29, 2006, Robert Reil wrote:
In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5
minutes
to recover from.
I guess I could do
-ending learning
process!
Thanks
John,
Allen
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John MasonSent:
Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:07 AMTo:
discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: XML Formatting
in CF5 question
Yep
why not use utf-8? guess it depends on your input formsOn 8/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick
update - just in case anyone else ever runs into this problem. Again, just
to restate quickly - say you have a German name with the double dots over the
u or you have a
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Ross
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 4:32
PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
XML Formatting in CF5 question
why not use utf-8? guess
it depends on your input forms
On 8/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I've seen those log files grow before and not cause these performance
issues. Simply stop the CF services, rename it, then start the CF
service.
your server is indicating some issues with:
C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\carbs\stores\1\category.cfm
C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\carbs\stores\1\product1.cfm
@acfug.orgTo discussion@acfug.org cc
Subject RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Who's going to CFUnited?I'll just step up and say I'm not contributing to the coordination because
I have just too much going on to take that on, let alone commit to being there. I will try to make it if someone gets
Of CameronChildressSent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 12:01 PM
To: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Who's going to CFUnited?Cool - looks like there will be a shortage of seating for lunch socome grab a seat ASAP when you can.
-CameronOn 6/28/06, Howard Fore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I was just thinking that, about it being
an Adobe/MM lawsuit that changed Homesite. Now they'll probably send it
to the product boneyard.
Shawn Gorrell
Web Development Applications Architect
Federal Reserve Bank - Atlanta
Office (404) 498-8449
Cameron Childress
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
PROTECTED]
06/27/2006 01:11 AM Please respond to discussion@acfug.org To discussion@acfug.org
cc Subject RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Who's going to CFUnited? I'll just step up and say I'm not contributing to the coordination because
I have just too much going on to take that on, let alone commit
That sounds good. On 6/24/06, Cameron Childress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for sure...most people going their own directions at night so itsmuch easier to get folks tofether at lunch.Sounds good.
I didn't even look, are they serving lunch for us?if so we can justagree to find a table together and
The questions remainsas such:What day does the ACFUG CF United attendees want to meet? Wednesday?There is an internet cafe in the expo area:http://www.cfunited.org/become_sponsor.cfm#expo
We need some logistics my friends. =)On 6/26/06, Howard Fore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds good. On
Anyday works for me.
Teddy Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/26/2006 8:34:34 AM
The questions remainsas such:
What day does the ACFUG CF United attendees want to meet? Wednesday?
There is an internet cafe in the expo area:
http://www.cfunited.org/become_sponsor.cfm#expo
We need some logistics my
I'm game for any day and I am attending as well.
P
Anyday works for me.
Teddy Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/26/2006 8:34:34 AM
The questions remainsas such:
What day does the ACFUG CF United attendees want to meet? Wednesday?
-
PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/26/2006 12:45 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Who's going
to CFUnited?
On 6/26/06, Cameron Childress [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
works for me too. I'd say lunch wed works
PROTECTED]
06/26/2006 12:45 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Who's going
to CFUnited?
On 6/26/06, Cameron Childress [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
works for me too. I'd say lunch wed works best so
we all know who's
@acfug.orgFrom: Teddy Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 06/26/2006 01:41PMSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Who's going to CFUnited?The CBS report did mention Montgomery county, but it did not mention highway 355. 355 is the main highway that connects eastern Maryland to D.C. 355 is also
]
On Behalf Of Teddy PayneSent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:35
AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re:
Who's going to CFUnited?
The questions remainsas such:What day does the ACFUG CF
United attendees want to meet? Wednesday?There is an internet cafe in
the expo area:http
CF_Lunch in Washington :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cameron
Childress
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 2:11 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Who's going to CFUnited?
I'm gonna be there too, tues through
FWIW, I'm not taking anything personal and I love to help where I can. I
thought the branch about legality was interesting enough to comment on it and I
tought I'd put in my $0.02. I'm not telling you what to do or not, just giving
my opinion. And as you wrote, if the shoe fits, wear it.
Since I started this, I assume its directed partly at me.
I have no problem helping you, Robert, and have offered lots of help
to your many questions in the past. However, I feel its in your best
interest to know what you are contemplating is possibly illegal and
certainly not something
There is even a better converter yethttp://www.cfeclipse.org/
On 5/10/06, PC Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a converter for that http://www.dwfaq.com/Snippets/converter.asp
PC- Original Message -From: Rob Seebach [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: discussion@acfug.org
Sent: Wednesday,
101 - 158 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
