On Mon, 6 May 2019 17:15:56 +0200
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> while 25% of the FSFE e.V. members have engaged in the discussion.
It’s simply because they have interest to maintain the current narrative
alive.
Besnik
___
Discussion mailing list
On Monday, 2019-05-06 17:49:16 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > To: discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu, discussion@lists.fsfe.org
> >> [...]
> > Interesting how that mail did not make it to Pocock's list, where every
> > mail now is manually approved.. or discarded..
>
> Given that over 90% of
Hi Karun,
Am 6. Mai 2019 19:11:58 MESZ schrieb Karun :
>After reading the posts here I’m seriously thinking to stop supporting
>the FSFE as a „supporter“ and also because of the fellowship
>discontinuation. In the Future it seems better to support the Free
>software Foundation in the us which’s
Hi Paul
Thanks for your mail, which raised some points that are very close to
what I myself have been thinking for some time now, albeit I believe
with a rather different backstory.
On 5/6/19 5:39 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
[..]
> I think I often make the point that advocacy has its place in
Dear Daniel,
thank you for the indirect distribution of my email. But, as a moderator
of this list, you block my email. Why?
You wrote:
"So what you write appears to be rather defamatory and offensive but
also a bit ridiculous."
Can you explain that? Tell me/us, what you think?
If a list
After reading the posts here I’m seriously thinking to stop supporting the FSFE
as a „supporter“ and also because of the fellowship discontinuation. In the
Future it seems better to support the Free software Foundation in the us
which’s more mature.
--
Karun
On Mon, 6 May 2019, at 5:51 PM,
On 06/05/2019 17:01, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 2019-05-04 15:41:26 +0200, Diogo Constantino wrote:
>
> To: discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu, discussion@lists.fsfe.org
>
>> [...]
>
> Interesting how that mail did not make it to Pocock's list, where every
> mail now is manually
Further to this, I think this morning (6/5/2019) on BBC breakfast there
was an article with regard to a company, in Sheffield, UK who were so
fed up with the lack of skills they are setting up their own training
academy so they can develop the skills they need.
In light of this, would it be
On May 6, 2019 11:15:56 AM EDT, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>Notice how the vast majority of messages come from people within that
>first group?
>
>Even though the second group is so much bigger, notice how very few
>fellows (0.25%) are actually engaged in the discussion, while 25% of
>the
>FSFE e.V.
On May 6, 2019 11:49:16 AM EDT, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> the other censors
Aren't you that other person you are talking about in the third person?
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Hi Paul,
Am 6. Mai 2019 14:41:31 MESZ schrieb Paul Sutton :
>Just a thought, I can try and convince people to offer training in
>libre
>office but one person won't make any difference.
>
I strongly believe that one person can make a hugh difference.
I live in Hannover and I am thinking about to
Hi Joe,
On 06.05.19 16:58, Joe Awni wrote:
> Personally, I have experienced instances of de facto censorship in the form
> of not being allowed to participate in an election,
You have not being allowed to participate because the deadline for candidates
have been on February 1st and you applied
Hi
On of the digital skills sites is https://www.learnmyway.com/ I think th
e issue with these digital unite et al is lack of volunteers who are the
digital champions with these skills to share them.
It needs education on open standards, but the argument is that everyone
uses MS word, and
On 06/05/2019 13:48, Stephane Ascoet wrote:
> Le 06/05/2019 à 12:50, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>> So what you write appears to be rather defamatory and offensive but also
>> a bit ridiculous. Just the type of thing that other people from FSFE
>> have been doing with private gossip emails.
>>
>>
I want to call your attention to a serious ongoing organizational asymmetry
between a group like the FSFE with their ties to big software (ie: Github
whom RMS has spoken against), dedicated office, staff, and budget vs an
unorganized set of independent Free Software developers who might be
Hello,
> On 6. May 2019, at 12:37, Paul Boddie wrote:
>
> On Saturday 4. May 2019 13.42.51 Nikos Roussos wrote:
>> On 03/05/2019 19:00, Paul Boddie wrote:
>>> So, in the case of the Copyright Directive, where much fuss was made about
>>> keeping code sharing platforms free of copyright filters,
Hi,
On Saturday, 2019-05-04 15:41:26 +0200, Diogo Constantino wrote:
To: discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu, discussion@lists.fsfe.org
> [...]
Interesting how that mail did not make it to Pocock's list, where every
mail now is manually approved.. or discarded..
Eike
--
OpenPGP/GnuPG
Le 06/05/2019 à 12:50, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
So what you write appears to be rather defamatory and offensive but also
a bit ridiculous. Just the type of thing that other people from FSFE
have been doing with private gossip emails.
Naturally, lists.fsfe.org allows offensive messages like
On Saturday 4. May 2019 13.42.51 Nikos Roussos wrote:
> On 03/05/2019 19:00, Paul Boddie wrote:
> > So, in the case of the Copyright Directive, where much fuss was made about
> > keeping code sharing platforms free of copyright filters, it seemed that
> > the FSFE was acting to defend GitHub and
On 06/05/2019 07:00, willi uebelherr wrote:
>
> Dear friends,
>
> the same i got in the fsf-de-maillist with the same IP adress
> 91.64.208.89 (Vodafone '91.64.0.0 - 91.64.255.255'). But in this time, i
> live in Asuncion in Paraguay and here in the hostal they have a Tigo
> Paraguay account.
Hi Paul,
Am Montag 06 Mai 2019 10:00:06 schrieb Paul Sutton:
> Now I am getting unauthorized attempts to remove me from the fsfe.org list
> What exactly is going on here please.
technically: Anyone can use the mailman interface to request
an unsubscribe event for a specific mail address. Mailman
Je lun, 2019-05-06 je 09:00 +0100, Paul Sutton skribis:
>
> On 06/05/2019 00:00, Paul Boddie wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I see that some people are still having fun with the Mailman interface
> > trying
> > to unsubscribe people from this list, specifically 91.64.208.89 or
> >
Hi Paul,
thanks for sharing your experiences!
Helping others to understand Free Software is an ongoing task
and it needs wit and patience. :)
Am Freitag 03 Mai 2019 13:01:52 schrieb Paul Sutton:
> I tried to approach people such as digital unite in the UK, who are
> working to bridge the digital
Hi,
> On 6. May 2019, at 04:36, Florian Snow wrote:
>
> Calling Daniel's behavior a symptom is a gross understatement.
The symptoms of some ailments can be quite unpleasant, even icky. But I see
your point. Now for some root cause analysis, please.
Cheers,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm |
Hi Paul,
Am Donnerstag 02 Mai 2019 21:45:40 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> I would also encourage the FSFE leadership to use venues like this list to
> more fully engage with the community, even when this involves encountering
> dissent.
doing a rough count on my personal archive which starts 2016:
Dear friends,
the same i got in the fsf-de-maillist with the same IP adress
91.64.208.89 (Vodafone '91.64.0.0 - 91.64.255.255'). But in this time, i
live in Asuncion in Paraguay and here in the hostal they have a Tigo
Paraguay account. In the email header, you can see the IP space.
I am
On 06/05/2019 00:00, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I see that some people are still having fun with the Mailman interface trying
> to unsubscribe people from this list, specifically 91.64.208.89 or
> ip5b40d059.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de as they are also known.
>
> Perhaps some actual,
27 matches
Mail list logo
