On Monday 6. May 2019 10.27.57 Bernhard E. Reiter wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Am Donnerstag 02 Mai 2019 21:45:40 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> > I would also encourage the FSFE leadership to use venues like this list to
> > more fully engage with the community, even when this involves encountering
> > dissent.
Hi Paul,
Am Donnerstag 02 Mai 2019 21:45:40 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> I would also encourage the FSFE leadership to use venues like this list to
> more fully engage with the community, even when this involves encountering
> dissent.
doing a rough count on my personal archive which starts 2016: There
Hi Novica,
On May 3, 2019 11:49:49 AM EDT, Novica Nakov wrote:
> What is https://fsfellowship.eu/?
That is a very good question. I would urge Daniel Pocock, the webmaster,
webhoster and ISP of that website to answer that question. It appears that he
wants to receive funds of about 200,000 Euro
Hi,
Is there a rival mailing list or a rival organization too? What is
https://fsfellowship.eu/?
-- nnvc
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
This mailing list is covered by the FSFE'
Hi Paul,
Thank you very much for your well thought out email (as always). I agree with
you that we need to resolve this, but I have no idea how.
Daniel's grievances with the FSFE are largely based on what I would call a
misunderstanding. Yet he reacted angrily to any attempt of clarification.
On 03/05/2019 10:46, Reinhard Müller wrote:
> Hi, Paul!
>
> Am 02.05.19 um 21:45 schrieb Paul Boddie:
>> It would obviously have been far more appropriate for Daniel to merely
>> advertise that another discussion venue has been set up and for him to
>> invite
>> those who are interested to si
Hi, Paul!
Am 02.05.19 um 21:45 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> It would obviously have been far more appropriate for Daniel to merely
> advertise that another discussion venue has been set up and for him to invite
> those who are interested to sign up for themselves. As far as I know, no such
> invitati
Hello,
Subscribers to this mailing list have recently been introduced to the
existence of a new "rival" mailing list [*] in a way that might well be
regarded as being both ill-conceived and regrettable. There may be merits in
conducting discussion on another list, but the apparent attempt to tr
