On 7/23/05, Jason Brunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I used to run monowall at home and in my office, but I have replaced the one
> here at home with the pfsense on my ip330. my ipsec won't connect up. I
> used to have a pfsense box that worked fine for ipsec to the office. Any
> thoughts,
No. Thats so old it has grey hairs.
Scott
On 7/23/05, Jason Brunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running
>
> 0.69.14
> built on Tue Jul 12 04:11:48 UTC 2005
>
>
> Is this a version that will do it automatically.
>
> Jason
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[
I used to run monowall at home and in my office, but I have
replaced the one here at home with the pfsense on my ip330. my ipsec won’t
connect up. I used to have a pfsense box that worked fine for ipsec to the
office. Any thoughts, anything I should look for?
Jason
I am running
0.69.14
built on Tue Jul 12 04:11:48 UTC 2005
Is this a version that will do it automatically.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 5:37 PM
To: Jason Brunk
Cc: Chris Buechler; discussion@pfsense.com
Subjec
Make sure your setting the dedicated VOIP bandwidth to 128kb or better.
Scott
On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Sorry, I got a little sidetracked with something else... This is what
> the queue is saying:
>
> qVOIPup51pps 107kb/s 0 borrows 0 suspends 2184 d
Opps, I was responding to another message...
Because I am currently downloading uploads, I can't see what the queue
usage is until I finish downloading...
On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Sorry, I got a little sidetracked with something else... This is what
> the
Bill,
Sorry, I got a little sidetracked with something else... This is what
the queue is saying:
qVOIPup51pps 107kb/s 0 borrows 0 suspends 2184 drops
qVOIPDown 50pps 85.60kb/s 0 borrows 0 suppends 0 drops
To get the numbers, I made a VOIP call to see what the changes were to
the queue.
On
On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking at the queue display and noticed that although VOIP is
> being allocated a good portion of bandwidth, that there are a log of
> dropped packets. What exactly does that mean, and what can I do to
> limit the drops?
Allocate enough
On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that when I was uploading the update to the router, that the
> speed was dirt slow... What would be a good entry in to traffic
> shaping to give great speed to updating?
Where was it slow from? The LAN, the WAN, the _fill in the bla
I was looking at the queue display and noticed that although VOIP is
being allocated a good portion of bandwidth, that there are a log of
dropped packets. What exactly does that mean, and what can I do to
limit the drops?
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
I noticed that when I was uploading the update to the router, that the
speed was dirt slow... What would be a good entry in to traffic
shaping to give great speed to updating?
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
__
It does it automatically with recent versions.
On 7/23/05, Jason Brunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, mine is all f's. any one know where I can get a good random
> generated one?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005
Is the key table for mobile ipsec supposed to be used for a shared
secret too?
On 7/23/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use BSNMPD. Could this be the difference?
>
If it is, the MIB is broken. Network adapter MIB's are the same
across all platforms and daemons. I'm using ifgraph on some
interfaces now, and will see if I can replicate the same behavior.
Right, mine is all f's. any one know where I can get a good random
generated one?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 3:58 PM
Cc: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] spoof mac
On 7/23/05, Scott Ullrich <[EM
On 7/23/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is only for network interfaces that have invalid mac addresses
> already (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). You can spoof the mac in the respected
> interface, there is a box for it. There is no way to randomly
> generate a mac address unless your o
This is only for network interfaces that have invalid mac addresses
already (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). You can spoof the mac in the respected
interface, there is a box for it. There is no way to randomly
generate a mac address unless your original address is invalid.
Scott
On 7/23/05, Jason Brunk
I thought I read that pfsense can spoof the mac and randomly
generate one on its own? I have so far not seen this utility. Any guidance
would be appreciative.
Jason
Thanks for the great news!
Scott
On 7/21/05, Thomas Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Success with SIP!
>
> Thanks for the wonderful package "siproxd" (why not have abetter name
> in the menu, maybe "SIP Proxy")!
>
> My P202S are working fine now :-)
>
> Thomas
>
>
Great news! I'm working on removing some of the extra steps that
where not present before but the hard disk partitioning stuff will
stay as that is what is most likely fixing the problems.
Scott
On 7/23/05, Michael Mee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dmitry Sorokin wrote:
> > Is there a reason fo
Dmitry Sorokin wrote:
Is there a reason for using new complicated version of installer? Maybe it's
better to go to older simplier version?
Otoh We're happy to report that the new installer recognised a
Western Digital 30GB hard disk that wouldn't work with the old
installer. We're optim
On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I need to load the updates in order or can I just download the
> latest.tgz and call it a day?
All images are currently full firmware updates. You can download any
of the updates in the updates directory and apply to go to that
version. l
On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was getting ready to make that bold move to update the latest, and
> noticed that it was a 30M upgrade... So what happens to all of the old
> configurations? Is it safe to just upload the updates? How does it
I won't guarantee it's safe - it
Do I need to load the updates in order or can I just download the
latest.tgz and call it a day?
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
___
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was getting ready to make that bold move to update the latest, and
noticed that it was a 30M upgrade... So what happens to all of the old
configurations? Is it safe to just upload the updates? How does it
work? Also, where are the changes to so what the upgrades have to
offer?
--
When It Absol
You could try installing pfsense normally from the livecd, I'm doing
this on two pfsense boxes, one on a 128MB CF with 20MB swap and the
other wioth 128M swap!^_^
I haven't seen any problems with pfsense, it's stable and upgradable... ^_^
also you can set up the CF card as a hard disk in VMware a
26 matches
Mail list logo
