Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Chris Buechler
On 8/11/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I spoke too soon. OpenVPN is not the problem itself, its the GUI + > Backend PHP code in pfSense. > Right, the author he was speaking of that hasn't sent patches is the author of the GUI and backend PHP code in m0n0wall, not the author of

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 8/11/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/11/05, James Yonan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Scott, > > > > We're planning on releasing 2.0.1 next week, most likely. When are you > > planning on freezing? > > Sometime next week, so this is perfect timing. > > > I'm on vacation r

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 8/11/05, James Yonan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott, > > We're planning on releasing 2.0.1 next week, most likely. When are you > planning on freezing? Sometime next week, so this is perfect timing. > I'm on vacation right now, so I didn't have a chance to go back and read > the origina

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread James Yonan
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On 8/11/05, James Yonan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm the author of OpenVPN. > > Great! > > > Please give me more info on this and/or any patches you might have so we > > can fix this. > > > > For example, you say that "I blew up a firewall in

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 8/11/05, James Yonan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm the author of OpenVPN. Great! > Please give me more info on this and/or any patches you might have so we > can fix this. > > For example, you say that "I blew up a firewall in 2 minutes flat" -- but > what do you mean by this? What did

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread James Yonan
>The author is very aware of us wanting an updated version but I have >not heard back from him. The reason that we removed openvpn from >pfSense is due to its nature of trashing optional interfaces >configurations. I blew up a firewall in 2 minutes flat by just >enabling the service and rebooti

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
The author is very aware of us wanting an updated version but I have not heard back from him. The reason that we removed openvpn from pfSense is due to its nature of trashing optional interfaces configurations. I blew up a firewall in 2 minutes flat by just enabling the service and rebooting.

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Bill Marquette
I think it was more along the lines of "it didn't work and we had too many other things to fix" --Bill On 8/11/05, Rui Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fernando Costa gmail.com> writes: > > > > > Hello all, > > > >I may say we have made a mistake over here. That is probably my > > fault

[pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Rui Correia
Fernando Costa gmail.com> writes: > > Hello all, > >I may say we have made a mistake over here. That is probably my > fault. I´m not sure about pfSense, but I thought m0n0 used to be based > on OpenVPN 1.6, and its not. Here it goes: > > Aug 11 09:41:50 openvpn[833]: OpenVPN 2.0 i386

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Fernando Costa
Hello all, I may say we have made a mistake over here. That is probably my fault. I´m not sure about pfSense, but I thought m0n0 used to be based on OpenVPN 1.6, and its not. Here it goes: Aug 11 09:41:50 openvpn[833]: OpenVPN 2.0 i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 [SSL] built on May 8 2005 M0n

[pfSense-discussion] Re: Openvpn v2

2005-08-11 Thread Rui Correia
Scott Ullrich gmail.com> writes: > > We are waiting for the author to release newer patches but am not sure > of the timeframe. Hi Scott, Thanks for clarifying this issue. Anyway, the lack of OpenVPN2 support is what is currently keeping me from using pfSense on a general basis on our customers