Re: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-11 Thread Chris Buechler
in case the other replies weren't enough: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote: > > I have tried dual wan and dual machine setup with no success. Dual wan > pfsense only works with single machine. Wrong. > carp also works, but both carp > *and* dual wan together does not work! Wron

Re: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-11 Thread Evgeny Yurchenko
From: Veiko Kukk [mailto:veiko.k...@krediidipank.ee] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 5:04 AM I have tried dual wan and dual machine setup with no success. Dual wan pfsense only works with single machine. carp also works, but both carp *and* dual wan together does not work! And seems there are

Re: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-11 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:22:52AM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote: > > I have tried dual wan and dual machine setup with no success. Dual wan > > pfsense only works with single machine. carp also works, but both carp > > *and* dual wan together does

Re: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-11 Thread Simon Cornelius P Umacob
Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Veiko Kukk wrote: > > I have tried dual wan and dual machine setup with no success. Dual wan > pfsense only works with single machine. carp also works, but both carp > *and* dual wan together does not work! > And seems there are very few who care about pfsense

Re: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote: > I have tried dual wan and dual machine setup with no success. Dual wan > pfsense only works with single machine. carp also works, but both carp > *and* dual wan together does not work! > And seems there are very few who care about pfsense failove

Re: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-11 Thread Holger Bauer
You are wrong. It IS working, if you set it up correctly. Please don't make such untrue statements. If you need help in setting it up the supportlist or forum is for you but don't tell people it is not working just because YOU were not able to get it running. Holger 2009/8/11 Veiko Kukk : > Eugen

Re: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-11 Thread Veiko Kukk
Eugen Leitl wrote: Can any of you point me to a network diagram illustrating such a setup, with two pfSense instances (how many NICs?) and two or three switches? I presume it needs carp+pfsync in order for it to work. I have tried dual wan and dual machine setup with no success. Dual wan pfsens

Re: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-07 Thread Chris Buechler
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > Is any of you running pfSense in a fully redundant hosting setting? > Care to share your setup? > I've done numerous designs and deployments like this for customers, it's one of the more common things we do. You might find my DCBSDCon 2009 pr

RE: [pfSense-discussion] fully redundant dual-WAN setup

2009-08-07 Thread Nathan Eisenberg
> -Original Message- > Is any of you running pfSense in a fully redundant hosting setting? > Care to share your setup? Your ability to utilize the increased bandwidth is dependent on how the uplink is configured. If you create an etherchannel, then the uplink is a function of layer 2, a