As usual, I have my own confusion :)
I didn't know there was a difference between PfSync and CARP, just thought
it was all the same solution used for redundancy.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 04,
I'm running 0.86 on a generic pc with 3 x dual FE cards. Similar errors with
0.85.2 as well.
When I configure vlans, I get the following errors :
ifconfig: interface vlan0 does not exist ifconfig: interface vlan0 does not
exist
ifconfig: interface vlan1 does not exist ifconfig: interface vlan1
At 04:38 PM 10/5/2005, you wrote:
I'm running 0.86 on a generic pc with 3 x dual FE cards. Similar errors with
0.85.2 as well.
When I configure vlans, I get the following errors :
ifconfig: interface vlan0 does not exist ifconfig: interface vlan0 does not
exist
ifconfig: interface vlan1 does
# ifconfig -a
tl0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
ether 00:80:5f:a7:83:4d
media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
status: no carrier
tl1: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
ether 00:80:5f:a7:83:cd
media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
I think its for ip over parallel port (printer (LPT1)).
-Original Message-
From: Chun Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:48 PM
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] problem with vlans
# ifconfig -a
tl0:
This looks good. Are you still reaching errors?
Scott
On 10/5/05, Chun Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry guys,
In my haste, I did the ifconfig -a after I had restored the previous good
config - doh!
fxp1 is my dmz which I would like to vlan into different subnets
fxp0 is my wan
fxp2
the vlan0 and vlan1 interfaces don't have IP
addresses, but the physical interface (fxp1)
does. Mixing and matching real interfaces and
vlan interfaces doesn't seem right...
At 05:06 PM 10/5/2005, you wrote:
This looks good. Are you still reaching errors?
Scott
On 10/5/05, Chun Wong
Hmm, strange, no errors after I restored. I have gone on to set the ip
address of the vlans.
Dan, I have used virtual and physical interfaces on other firewalls (Nokia
running CP NG), I treat the physical as vlan 1.
If I get a chance, I'll try it again and see if I can repeat it.
Regards
Chun
At 05:30 PM 10/5/2005, you wrote:
Hmm, strange, no errors after I restored. I have gone on to set the ip
address of the vlans.
Dan, I have used virtual and physical interfaces on other firewalls (Nokia
running CP NG), I treat the physical as vlan 1.
this is not nokia :) not saying it can't
you're right, its me being defensive ;0)
at the moment the vlans are working ok, even in my strange setup!
now I am learning the way pfsense handles rules, esp. the implied ones.
Cheers
Chun
Dan, I have used virtual and physical interfaces on other firewalls
(Nokia
running CP NG), I treat
On 10/5/05, Chun Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now I am learning the way pfsense handles rules, esp. the implied ones.
heh, that's something I plan on eventually providing more visibility
into - we're just not there yet :)
--Bill
I think monowall and pfsense are great firewalls, features and performance
at a great price point ;-) A little rough around the edges sometimes,
especially pfsense and it's addon packages, but orders of magnitude more
friendly to use than the raw PF, ipchains etc and much more flexible than
IPCOP
wow.. ok... did not realize altq was not working on OPT interfaces...
that tidbit would have saved me hours of tinking around... i think
maybe you should put something in bold letters on the web interface...
i was cussing rather loudly a few weeks ago at your firewall when my
Vonage (on OPT1) was
13 matches
Mail list logo
