Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
Again, is there any estimate for 1.3?
This is 100% completely open source. The source ported to RELENG_1_2 is
even in the public CVS server in its own branch.
Chris Buechler wrote on 23-3-2008 8:51:
Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
Again, is there any estimate for 1.3?
This is 100% completely open source. The source ported to RELENG_1_2 is
even in
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Jan Hoevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote on 23-3-2008 8:51:
Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
Again, is there any estimate for 1.3?
Oh,oh,oh...
I really didn't wanted to fire up such a discussion.
My 2 ct. regarding pfSense, open source and community work:
Open source means for me that for that specific application I can get anytime
the source code to be able to modify it or extend it.
As pfSense base its license on the
Ermal Luçi wrote on 23-3-2008 11:08:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Jan Hoevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote on 23-3-2008 8:51:
Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Jan Hoevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is 100% completely open source. The source ported to RELENG_1_2 is
even in the public CVS server in its own branch. It's just the images
including it are not publicly available. It was back ported as a thanks
to
PS. It's probably worth noting that I'm also the author of the
existing annoying wizard.
