Re: [pfSense-discussion] oink, oink

2010-02-26 Thread Jim Pingle
On 2/26/2010 10:26 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: There's no way to get snort to run on an ALIX, am I correct? It should work but you must be _very_ frugal in choosing the (few) rule sets you want to load. Also setting it to lowmem is a must. Jim

Re: [pfSense-discussion] modified nanoBSD 1.2.3 image for WRAP?

2010-03-08 Thread Jim Pingle
On 3/8/2010 3:25 PM, Christoph Hanle wrote: On 07.03.2010 18:23 Eugen Leitl wrote: Does anyone have the 1 GByte 1.2.3 image modified for WRAP around? Thanks. Hi Eugen, please be carefull with production usage of pfSense 1.2.3 on WRAP, I have more troubles with this combiniation on my home

Re: [pfSense-discussion] modified nanoBSD 1.2.3 image for WRAP?

2010-03-08 Thread Jim Pingle
On 3/8/2010 5:51 PM, David Rees wrote: I've seen same or similar behavior on an ALIX box with a fairly large ruleset and decent number of VPNs. We could never get all the VPNs to come up properly and we eventually ended up with a corrupted configuration file while we were trying to

Re: [pfSense-discussion] API?

2010-11-12 Thread Jim Pingle
On 11/12/2010 2:01 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote: I have a customer who wants to be able to automate IP blackholing on their PFSense firewall from their custom IDS. In essence, the application wants to go something like 'I'm being abused by this IP 198.51.100.20' 'POST

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Jim Pingle
On 1/2/2011 5:00 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: I'm screwed up after yesterday's update. The firewall stopped routing after yesterday's upgrade to 2.0-BETA5 built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011 The firewall seems to see everthing (with the exception of package updates: Unable to communicate

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Jim Pingle
On 1/2/2011 10:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:36:42AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: If there is, it's probably related to the packages you had installed... I agree it's probably the packages. I've noticed it before, so usually I purge the packages before upgrade. Got lazy

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Jim Pingle
On 1/2/2011 12:35 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:44:07AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: The packages should be OK again now. See the packages, upgrade of the other systems (from a snapshot of 15 days ago) was uneventful (I purged whatever few packages I had). Is carp

Re: [pfSense-discussion] squid.inc gotchas

2011-06-06 Thread Jim Pingle
On 6/6/2011 5:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 18:04, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org [snip] http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,32923.msg191044.html [snip] So in essence, we need: (12:25:03 ~) 0 $ diff squid.inc squid.inc.local 527c527