Seeing that the current ALIX platform can switch at about 75Mbps, if the CPU on
those plugs isn't much better, Gig-E gets you little advantage. I agree,
though, it'd be nice to see a little better hardware at that size.
-Adrian
- Original Message -
From: Mark Crane m...@netprofx.com
You should set the in/out maxes to the real available bandwidth you experience.
Do several tests against different test sites. If you set those max values
too high, the shaper will allow you to clog your pipe (it let's too much
traffic pass without shaping because it thinks it has more
619-318-3246 Cell
www.BIGnetOnline.com
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net wrote:
You should set the in/out maxes to the real available bandwidth you
experience. Do several tests against different test sites. If you set those
max values too high
Sounds like they're looking for a service that scans ports remotely, like some
of those returned by googling:
- Original Message -
From: RB aoz@gmail.com
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 8:20:11 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re:
Sorry... googling:
online port scanner free
Honestly, I've never looked for a service like this. Has anyone?
Regards,
Adrian
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 8:53:59 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Message -
From: Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
Hello,
So, it seems you are configuring as such:
LAN1: 10.aaa.bbb.ccc/8
LAN2: 10.xxx.yyy.zzz/8
My apologies, I meant Network layer, not Transport. Sheesh. Serves me right
for spamming the list with general info (as I spam it again with my correction
;)
snip
So there 4 bits in the 2nd octet, 8 bits in the 3rd octet, and 8 bits in the
4th octet that are valid for use as IPs on the
Hello,
So, it seems you are configuring as such:
LAN1: 10.aaa.bbb.ccc/8
LAN2: 10.xxx.yyy.zzz/8
This is not right, since /8 means a netmask of 255.0.0.0, making the network
portion of each subnet only the first octet... thus the same subnet. Two
devices with configured with the same
I think he understood, but was suggesting other virtualization ideas that he
felt would be a more rewarding use of developer resources. To me, it sounds
like you want the feature set of pfsense available on a platform that runs
virtual machines... for example, having a pfSense option in
Something akin to this idea was discussed a while ago, and the best practice
would be to steer clear of it. It's not always advantageous to put all your
eggs in one basket (sorry for the overused analogy).
Ideally, if you need something as complex as what pfSense provides, you would
be
Hello,
It certainly isn't a replacement for pfSense, but untangle
[http://www.untangle.com/] is pretty useful. I'm running for some clients in
bridging mode between pfSense and their internal network. It has much of the
same functionality Barracuda boxes tout. It emails reports on
I'll second that. Security is the goal behind a device running pfSense or any
other suite of software for filtering and controlling traffic. As for the
original poster, I would recommend netgate.com:
ALIX with 3xRJ45, 512MB CF, mini PCI for 802.11...:
Whoops, typed ALIX on the wrong line ;)
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Wenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 3:35:16 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Setup advice wanted, devices for public
library
I'll
enclosures from netgate.com are nice though, good for branding.
-Adrian
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Wenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 3:35:16 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Setup advice wanted, devices
What you're looking for is under System - Advanced, labeled Disable NAT
Reflection. Uncheck this box, save, and pfsense will automatically create
rules to redirect traffic back to localhost hosts when accessed by the external
IP. pfsense uses netcat for this, however, unlike Linux and
Hello,
Look under the menus Firewall - Virtual IPs. Add a virtual IP, leaving the
default Proxy ARP for type.
Cheers,
Adrian
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Basti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:26:47 AM (GMT-0500)
16 matches
Mail list logo
