Re: [pfSense-discussion] HOW MUCH TRUST ON PFSENSE ?
Hi, Thanks a lot to everybody for coming in this discussion and for sharing their experiences that convinced me to traslate into a production environment with no problems! Anyway i still have some little doubts on implementing a DMZ containing all the servers, behind NAT. This because i don't know how pfsense's NAT implementation can handle the new internet applications/protocols like AJAX or WEB-SERVICES or others that could make use of mechanisms like dynamic allocation of port. Don't you think pfsense (actually NAT) can suffer this? Again thanks to everybody! Bye Paolo
[pfSense-discussion] HOW MUCH TRUST ON PFSENSE ?
Hi all, i'm planning to use pfsense as a multiwan and firewall solution for an enterprise network of about 40 desktop pc and 15 internet servers (with various HTTP/POP3/SMTP/DNS/DHCP services) I'm currently installed it on a desktop for learning purposes and i'm testing it with no more than 3 or 4 pc with no problems but i'm not sure about its stability when passing to a real case of use with all my network operators. Before do the critical step of making it my main enterprise internet gateway i'd like to hear from you, your thoughts or experiences about how much trust can i have on pfsense and about passing from testing phase to the production regardless to the power of hardware used for running pfsense (which of course have as strong impact on throuhput). Bye Paolo Gentili
