On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Angus Jordan wrote:
>
> I had configured the servers behind the pfsense bridge with the
> gateway pointing directly at the pfsense firewall. When I modified the
> gateway on the servers to use the real upstream gateway, all is
> normal.
>
Ah yeah, that'll do it. Lo
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Angus Jordan wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I've attached the logs directly from the /var/log/filter.log. These
>> show up at exactly the same time the download stops...
>>
>
> What happens if you lower the MTU on
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Angus Jordan wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've attached the logs directly from the /var/log/filter.log. These
> show up at exactly the same time the download stops...
>
What happens if you lower the MTU on the server to 1450?
Hi yet again,
Here are the interface assignments:
WAN: em1
LAN: em0
Regards,
Angus
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Angus Jordan wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've attached the logs directly from the /var/log/filter.log. These
> show up at exactly the same time the download stops...
>
> Let me know
Hi again,
I've attached the logs directly from the /var/log/filter.log. These
show up at exactly the same time the download stops...
Let me know what other information I can provide.
Thanks,
Angus
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Angus Jordan wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>> Make sure you're using e10
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Angus Jordan wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>> Make sure you're using e1000 interfaces. Also might want to try
>> "disable checksum offload" under System -> Advanced.
>
> Both of these options are selected, same symptoms..although it does
> take much longer for the problem to
Hi Chris,
> Make sure you're using e1000 interfaces. Also might want to try
> "disable checksum offload" under System -> Advanced.
Both of these options are selected, same symptoms..although it does
take much longer for the problem to creep up.
Unfortunately this is mainly affecting outbound ema
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Angus Jordan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Yes, the pfSense does show blocks in on the wan interface. I wish I
> could send them to you, but for some reason since you sent this email
> the issue seems to have stopped...but it will be back, I know that.
>
> One thing that I
:
>
>
> Possibly an issue with TCP window scaling or PMTU-D.
>
> Are the logs generating any drops for the flow ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Angus Jordan [mailto:angus.jor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 15 July 2009 22:08
> To: discussion@pfsense.com
> Subject: [p
Possibly an issue with TCP window scaling or PMTU-D.
Are the logs generating any drops for the flow ?
-Original Message-
From: Angus Jordan [mailto:angus.jor...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 July 2009 22:08
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense-discussion] Very odd issue - Transparent
Hi there,
We have deployed 2 pfSense Transparent firewalls at 2 separate
locations. The commonality between both locations is their Internet
provider.
1) pfSense running directly in the providers co-location (Customer
servers -> Astaro NAT firewall -> pfSense Transparent Firewall ->
Customer Colo
11 matches
Mail list logo
