No Worries Adrian,
I am confident I won't be the only one to benefit, thank you.
Kind regards
David
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1
] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
My apologies, I meant Network layer, not Transport. Sheesh. Serves me
right for spamming the list with general info (as I spam it again with my
correction ;)
snip
So there 4 bits in the 2nd octet, 8 bits in the 3rd octet, and 8 bits in
the 4th octet that are valid
regards
David
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
Hello,
So, it seems you are configuring as such:
LAN1: 10.aaa.bbb.ccc/8
LAN2
, February 28, 2009 12:53 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
Hi Adrian
Thank you so much for your response.
I think those numbers do have something to do with it, as when I enable
OPT1 I loose the webserver's access and have to reset to a
default and start over
Apologies for the repeat post, ISP email problem seemed to have lost it, then
later on spat it out
(Not sure if you guys want yet another email to explain!?)
Kind regards
David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
be appreciated please.
Kind regards
David
- Original Message -
From: Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
Hi Adrian
Thank you so much for your response.
I think those
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:53, Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
I have since tried configuring as:
LAN1: 10.aaa.bbb.ccc/8
LAN2: 10.(aaa+1).bbb.ccc/9
I presume I have still got it wrong.
Yes. Any /9 is still a subset of a /8 with the same prefix, and
unless you really know what you're
: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
I think I've moved this on some.
What I did was avoid the subnet issues which I was clearly running into (and
not fully understanding), I opted to use a
172.10.x.x/16 private range for the 2nd LAN.
I entered the rules as per DarkFoon (Thank you)
Using
My apologies, I meant Network layer, not Transport. Sheesh. Serves me right
for spamming the list with general info (as I spam it again with my correction
;)
snip
So there 4 bits in the 2nd octet, 8 bits in the 3rd octet, and 8 bits in the
4th octet that are valid for use as IPs on the
desired access after this
is working.
Thanks,
Adrian
- Original Message -
From: Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 12:05:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)
Hi
I have been
10 matches
Mail list logo