Re: [pfSense-discussion] __Shaping__ UI

2005-10-31 Thread Scott Ullrich
Not to mention we want to release in the next month, not in the next 3-4 months. If we gut the shaper again, it will require a _LOT_ of testing and work for 1.0. At this point we will ship a shaping system that works for a majority of the people but for some it will show some limitations. Thes

Re: [pfSense-discussion] __Shaping__ UI

2005-10-31 Thread Bill Marquette
On 10/31/05, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is in response to a post Chris made (see below) on the m0n0 list. > > Personally I would prefer a fully functional shaper with a difficult > to use UserInterface rather than a very limited shaper with easy to > use UI. To be clear, the limitations

[pfSense-discussion] __Shaping__ UI

2005-10-30 Thread sai
This is in response to a post Chris made (see below) on the m0n0 list. Personally I would prefer a fully functional shaper with a difficult to use UserInterface rather than a very limited shaper with easy to use UI. So how about going for the integrated firewall rules with shaping? I would say th