mainly
wanted to make a point about the complexity of numbers, data, impact,
assumptions and so on to avoid too simple assumptions.
ps: sorry for the long email.
Best,
Erik
[1]
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/457isi/best_sticker_ive_seen_in_a_while/
--
negative. For example,
what narrative do we need to use to give proprietary software the same
urgency as a burning kitchen or contaminated water?
Regards,
Daniel
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_water_crisis
___
Discussion mailing list
rico Bruni
wrote:
Il giorno mer 26 lug 2017 alle 13:28, Ioli Papadopoulou
ha scritto:
Excellent topic; thank you for bringing it
up.
Avoiding negative language will help us become BETTER
ambassado
Good morning,
I am very pleased to see that you bring up this issue. GDPR offers a
great opportunity to promote FOSS.
FOSS is definitely far more "GDPR-ready" than proprietary or
closed-code. *But, what an irony! *Who shouts the most about GDPR these
days? Delivers free seminars with free fo
Good afternoon,
I agree with you, Mat. I don't have a plan yet, but I have an idea of
what could be done to this direction:
We certainly need to agree upon a plan with clear objectives: what we
want to achieve, how and when. We also need volunteers for the
"field-work", a steering committee
Hallo to all!
We would
like to introduce a new FOSS email webadmin that enables control
of multiple email
servers through a single screen. Servers may be on different
locations, on
premises, on cloud or hybrid.
GitHUB
