Re: FSFE-in-2020: Who are we?

2019-10-10 Thread Florian Snow
Hi Mirko, Mirko Boehm writes: > I think we are getting numb to bullshitting. So let me rephrase this > in simple speech: The FSFE-in-2020 ground to a halt because the > decision makers (our GA and the president) did not prioritise it I'm sorry, but that is not my impression at all. The

Old process (Re: FSFE-in-2020: Who are we?)

2019-10-10 Thread Bernhard E. Reiter
Am Mittwoch 09 Oktober 2019 10:02:16 schrieb Mirko Boehm: > So let me rephrase this in > simple speech: The FSFE-in-2020 ground to a halt because the decision > makers (our GA and the president) did not prioritise it They did indeed not, but for good reasons (which you don't seem to agree to,

Re: FSFE-in-2020: Who are we?

2019-10-09 Thread Mirko Boehm
Hi, > On 8. Oct 2019, at 17:32, Bernhard E. Reiter wrote: > >> Did the whole process grind to a halt, perhaps due to broader collaboration >> issues? > > in short: Yes. > > Though maybe "broader collaboration" is a bit coarse. > My personal take: the process was too heavy and it turned out it

Re: FSFE-in-2020: Who are we?

2019-10-08 Thread Bernhard E. Reiter
Hi Paul, Am Freitag 08 Februar 2019 01:40:40 schrieb Paul Boddie: > On Friday 11. August 2017 12.54.53 Jonas Oberg wrote: > > https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170811-01.en.html > > > > As you know, when the FSFE was founded, we put together a document > > describing our self conception. That

Re: FSFE-in-2020: Who are we?

2019-02-08 Thread Paul Boddie
On Friday 11. August 2017 12.54.53 Jonas Oberg wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I wanted to point you to this open internship position at the FSFE: > > https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170811-01.en.html > > As you know, when the FSFE was founded, we put together a document > describing our self