[pfSense-discussion] What is /etc/ping_hosts.sh for exactly?

2007-08-29 Thread Tortise
Hi In writing a program to run a 5 minute ping / ifconfig rescue (which I think I may have achieved - appended) I note the cron job running every 5 minutes */5 * * * * root /etc/ping_hosts.sh /etc/ping_hosts.sh contains: #!/bin/sh # pfSense ping helper # written by Scott Ullrich # (C)2006

[pfSense-discussion] php: : Not installing nat reflection rules for a port range 500 (1.2-RC2)

2007-11-09 Thread Tortise
Hi Team I added a rule for MS TS access to 3389, I get logged php: : Not installing nat reflection rules for a port range 500 and the connection does not seem to be created. I cannot however find a port range 500 and the port added is a single port. Can anyone advise me on this please?

Re: [pfSense-discussion] php: : Not installing nat reflection rules for a port range 500 (1.2-RC2)

2007-11-11 Thread Tortise
5:22 AM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] php: : Not installing nat reflection rules for a port range 500 (1.2-RC2) You most likely have a port range defined. Scott On Nov 9, 2007 2:26 AM, Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Team I added a rule for MS TS access to 3389, I get logged php

Re: [pfSense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - ingle ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries?

2008-04-03 Thread Tortise
-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - ingle ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries? Tortise wrote: kernel: arp: unknown hardware address format (0x) kernel: arp: unknown hardware address format (0xdd1f) kernel: arp: 192.168.0.7 is on em1 but got reply from 00:00:cd:1c:14:1a

Re: [pfSense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - single ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries?

2008-04-04 Thread Tortise
Yes I am using 192.168.0.0/24 I have no devices from those manufacturers. This was not the response I wanted to hear, changing the LAN is a major(!) Can you clarify the nature of the pfSense ARP cache? Is it relevant? (I am not convinced that it is - either the ARP packet is correct or it

Re: [pfSense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - single ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries?

2008-04-04 Thread Tortise
Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - single ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries? On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I am

Re: [pfSense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - single ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries?

2008-04-04 Thread Tortise
: Saturday, April 05, 2008 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] ARP traffic causing routers to hang - single ARP cache with both LAN and WAN ARP entries? On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The pain you refer to is close to the same, however at this point it remains

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread Tortise
: Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 12:05:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1) Hi I have been trying to setup a WAN and two LAN. (3 NIC's) I want LAN1 to be able to access LAN2

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread Tortise
Apologies for the repeat post, ISP email problem seemed to have lost it, then later on spat it out (Not sure if you guys want yet another email to explain!?) Kind regards David - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread Tortise
be appreciated please. Kind regards David - Original Message - From: Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:17 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1) Hi Adrian Thank you so much for your response. I think those

[pfSense-discussion] 1.2.2 CPU Division by zero error in index.php

2009-02-28 Thread Tortise
Hi In the index.php page CPU usage value I am getting: Warning: Division by zero in /usr/local/www/includes/functions.inc.php on line 66 0% This is with the embedded image on a CF, Pentium 400, 756M RAM. If I can assist further please let me know. Kind regards David

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2.2 CPU Division by zero error in index.php

2009-02-28 Thread Tortise
at all. Kind regards David - Original Message - From: Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 1:51 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2.2 CPU Division by zero error in index.php On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Tortise tort

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-03-01 Thread Tortise
No Worries Adrian, I am confident I won't be the only one to benefit, thank you. Kind regards David - Original Message - From: Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 6:22 AM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

[pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Free BSD CPU kern.cp_time Jams in some environments

2009-04-04 Thread Tortise
Hi Is anyone else getting this? It is occurring if you get a either a 1) divide by zero error on the index page for CPU Usage or 2) an indication the CPU is always on 0% use, which it shouldn't be for long! It seems to occur 1.2.2 onwards and on some motherboards and not others. It is

[pfSense-discussion] WAN, LAN1, LAN2 and LAN3

2009-05-06 Thread Tortise
Hi I need to give public SSH access to a box for a remote chap who does not have a static IP. I may be able to give him a PPTP user account connecting to the specified boxes IP. Boxes IP's are assigned using DHCP server. I wish to maintain my security(!) The box he is getting access to is

Re: [pfSense-discussion] article: Millions of Home Routers at Risk

2010-08-03 Thread Tortise
- Original Message - From: John Dakos gda...@enovation.gr To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:57 PM Subject: RE: [pfSense-discussion] article: Millions of Home Routers at Risk Re pf.jpg can someone clarify what a Yes in the right column represents please: a)