Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-03-01 Thread Tortise
No Worries Adrian, I am confident I won't be the only one to benefit, thank you. Kind regards David - Original Message - From: Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 6:22 AM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-03-01 Thread DarkFoon
] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1) My apologies, I meant Network layer, not Transport. Sheesh. Serves me right for spamming the list with general info (as I spam it again with my correction ;) snip So there 4 bits in the 2nd octet, 8 bits in the 3rd octet, and 8 bits in the 4th octet that are valid

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread Tortise
regards David - Original Message - From: Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 7:05 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1) Hello, So, it seems you are configuring as such: LAN1: 10.aaa.bbb.ccc/8 LAN2

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread DarkFoon
, February 28, 2009 12:53 AM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1) Hi Adrian Thank you so much for your response. I think those numbers do have something to do with it, as when I enable OPT1 I loose the webserver's access and have to reset to a default and start over

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread Tortise
Apologies for the repeat post, ISP email problem seemed to have lost it, then later on spat it out (Not sure if you guys want yet another email to explain!?) Kind regards David - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread Tortise
be appreciated please. Kind regards David - Original Message - From: Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:17 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1) Hi Adrian Thank you so much for your response. I think those

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread RB
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:53, Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz wrote: I have since tried configuring as: LAN1: 10.aaa.bbb.ccc/8 LAN2: 10.(aaa+1).bbb.ccc/9 I presume I have still got it wrong. Yes. Any /9 is still a subset of a /8 with the same prefix, and unless you really know what you're

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread Adrian Wenzel
setup? Any further guidance would be appreciated please. Kind regards David - Original Message - From: Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz To: discussion@pfsense.com Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:17 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1) Hi Adrian Thank you so

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-28 Thread Adrian Wenzel
My apologies, I meant Network layer, not Transport. Sheesh. Serves me right for spamming the list with general info (as I spam it again with my correction ;) snip So there 4 bits in the 2nd octet, 8 bits in the 3rd octet, and 8 bits in the 4th octet that are valid for use as IPs on the

Re: [pfSense-discussion] WAN LAN1 and LAN2 (OPT1)

2009-02-27 Thread Adrian Wenzel
Hello, So, it seems you are configuring as such: LAN1: 10.aaa.bbb.ccc/8 LAN2: 10.xxx.yyy.zzz/8 This is not right, since /8 means a netmask of 255.0.0.0, making the network portion of each subnet only the first octet... thus the same subnet. Two devices with configured with the same