Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense 2.0 ssh login question

2010-12-02 Thread Harald Jenny
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:39:52AM -0500, Andrew C Burnette wrote: > root (old history, but still valid) needs a shell that's statically > built (e.g. no linked libraries). In case a library disappears or in the > default *nix/*bsd distro the /usr partition doesn't mount, you can still > log in and

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense 2.0 ssh login question

2010-12-02 Thread Andrew C Burnette
root (old history, but still valid) needs a shell that's statically built (e.g. no linked libraries). In case a library disappears or in the default *nix/*bsd distro the /usr partition doesn't mount, you can still log in and attempt a repair. As mentioned, add in another account manually, with you

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense 2.0 ssh login question

2010-12-01 Thread Harald Jenny
Hi Adam, first thanks for your long and comprehensive answer. Sorry for not providing this information in the first place as I did not think it makes any difference but I'm using the embedded version with NanoBSD. On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 01:16:09AM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote: > /etc/rc.initial, l

RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense 2.0 ssh login question

2010-12-01 Thread Adam Thompson
/etc/rc.initial, line 114 (on my build, anyway). For whatever reason, choosing option 8 invokes tcsh(1) directly. Presumably you could change this, but I don't know what else this could break... *probably* nothing except future updates, or more likely you'd have to re-change the file after ev