On 16 Jun 2003, Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2003 13:53, Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos wrote:
Thanks for providing a graphical monitor. Just a detail, maybe it would
be much more useful if it used GTK+ instead of Gnome. Also I'm not sure
what it's supposed to
I'm trying to compile Distcc on OS X (gcc 3.1) and it fails with the
following:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_GNU_SOURCE -I./popt -I./src
-DSYSCONFDIR=\/usr/local/etc\ -g -O2 -W -Wall -W -Wimplicit
-Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings
-Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes
On 19 Jun 2003, Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how critical is this if, say, we have gcc 3.2.2 mixed with 3.2.1?
I should say that distcc doesn't care about versions at all. It is
just a matter of which versions of gcc produce output that is mutually
compatible.
In general I think there
On 18 Jun 2003, Dara Hazeghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
it's good to see that distcc just keeps improving! I
had one question. In the known problems list, it is
mentioned (or rather implied) that distcc can't be
used for gcc bootstraps. Is this still the case? If
so, perhaps a bug can
