+1 from me for the adjustment Thomas suggested, since that's in the
intended vein of "properly document the status quo".
On 11 January 2018 at 00:54, Daniel Holth wrote:
> AFAICT the only missing feature from old-Metadata-2.0 is "description as
> message body", which places readable description t
AFAICT the only missing feature from old-Metadata-2.0 is "description as
message body", which places readable description text after the key/value
pairs.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> I hope everyone has had a good break. :-)
>
> I'd like to see PEP 566 move forwards. F
I hope everyone has had a good break. :-)
I'd like to see PEP 566 move forwards. From the last thread, I think people
were mostly happy with it as stands, but there were some proposals to introduce
further metadata changes. I'd suggest that we finalise the PEP as it currently
stands, and save u
