>
>
> If we were happy with something simple, a wheel of cheese bearing the
> Python logo would be entirely appropriate :)
>
>
I second that motion.
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-
Everybody:
Jannis sorted out the permissions.
All the existing pypa people have admin access and Nick.
(except paul moore, not sure what your account is on bitbucket?)
I've created the 2 projects we talked about here: https://bitbucket.org/pypa
https://bitbucket.org/pypa/python-packaging-develop
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Marcus Smith wrote:
> and pypa needs a cool logo now...
If we were happy with something simple, a wheel of cheese bearing the
Python logo would be entirely appropriate :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_
and pypa needs a cool logo now...
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> I'm in favour of using the pypa brand.
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 21 March 2013 18:13, Marcus Smith wrote:
>
>> as it as now, I can create qwcode repos and give access to the Pypa
>> group, but not seeing how to crea
+1 for pypa as well.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> I'm in favour of using the pypa brand.
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 21 March 2013 18:13, Marcus Smith wrote:
>
>> as it as now, I can create qwcode repos and give access to the Pypa
>> group, but not seeing how to create repos man
I'm in favour of using the pypa brand.
Paul
On 21 March 2013 18:13, Marcus Smith wrote:
> as it as now, I can create qwcode repos and give access to the Pypa group,
> but not seeing how to create repos managed by pypa and have them show under
> that account.
> I'm less familiar with bitbucket
as it as now, I can create qwcode repos and give access to the Pypa group,
but not seeing how to create repos managed by pypa and have them show under
that account.
I'm less familiar with bitbucket teams? anyone? create them and then
transfer to Pypa maybe?
or I just don't have the permissions to
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Marcus Smith wrote:
> > Nick:
> >
> > I'm not sure who owns it yet.
>
> I ran into Jannis before he left this morning, and he was fairly sure
> someone decided it would also be a good idea to register it on
On 2013-03-20 22:22:40 +, Marcus Smith said:
so, counting the beans... : )
we have 8 "active" pypa people in my count.
I think 5 yea votes would make it official
I see 3 yea votes so far.
I'm willing to change my vote "for the good of the whole" if needed,
but I'm still curious to hear ho
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> We already have multiple "teams" on the github PyPA to allow for
> different committers on pip vs virtualenv. AFAIK bitbucket also supports
> per-repo access control. So I don't see any reason this should be a
> problem: using the name "PyPA" as
On Mar 20, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Marcus Smith wrote:
> so, counting the beans... : )
> we have 8 "active" pypa people in my count.
> I think 5 yea votes would make it official
> I see 3 yea votes so far.
> I'm willing to change my vote "for the good of the whole" if needed, but I'm
> still curiou
so, counting the beans... : )
we have 8 "active" pypa people in my count.
I think 5 yea votes would make it official
I see 3 yea votes so far.
I'm willing to change my vote "for the good of the whole" if needed, but
I'm still curious to hear how non-pypa feel about this.
Marcus
__
FWIW I think if pip and virtualenv are being elevated to a new level of
"official", I have no problem with the "pypa" name being used as the
umbrella for the next few years' "improve python packaging" efforts. I
know I've talked to some people who don't follow packaging closely who
thought this was
On 20 March 2013 18:01, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> If it is one of us, then it would need to be a group vote to use the pypa
>> "brand name" like this.
>> I'll try to get all the pypa people to come here and register their opinion.
>>
>> here's my personal thoughts:
>>
>> I understand the motivation t
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Marcus Smith wrote:
>> Nick:
>>
>> I'm not sure who owns it yet.
>
> I ran into Jannis before he left this morning, and he was fairly sure
> someone decided it would also be a good idea to register it on
> Bi
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Marcus Smith wrote:
> Nick:
>
> I'm not sure who owns it yet.
I ran into Jannis before he left this morning, and he was fairly sure
someone decided it would also be a good idea to register it on
BitBucket after the GitHub group was set up.
> If it is one of us,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Marcus Smith wrote:
> Nick:
>
> I'm not sure who owns it yet.
> If it is one of us, then it would need to be a group vote to use the pypa
> "brand name" like this.
> I'll try to get all the pypa people to come here and register their
> opinion.
>
> here's my pers
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Marcus Smith wrote:
> Nick:
>
> I'm not sure who owns it yet.
> If it is one of us, then it would need to be a group vote to use the pypa
> "brand name" like this.
> I'll try to get all the pypa people to come here and register their opinion.
>
> here's my personal
Nick:
I'm not sure who owns it yet.
If it is one of us, then it would need to be a group vote to use the pypa
"brand name" like this.
I'll try to get all the pypa people to come here and register their opinion.
here's my personal thoughts:
I understand the motivation to reuse our name, but proba
Hey pip/virtualenv folks, does one of you control the pypa placeholder
account on BitBucket? (it seems possible, given it was created shortly
after the Github account).
I've been pondering the communicating-with-the-broader-community issue
(especially in relation to
http://simeonfranklin.com/blog/
20 matches
Mail list logo
