On 21 July 2018 at 01:15, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> I have updated PEP 518:
>> https://github.com/python/peps/commit/af73627e587c25b9ac6f28a0fda01953252df391#diff-f068c801ccb40fad40c0436ff1e25e3f
>
> LGTM. Thanks Brett!
LGTM also. Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I have updated PEP 518:
> https://github.com/python/peps/commit/af73627e587c25b9ac6f28a0fda01953252df391#diff-f068c801ccb40fad40c0436ff1e25e3f
LGTM. Thanks Brett!
-n
--
Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org
--
Distutils-SIG mailing
I have updated PEP 518:
https://github.com/python/peps/commit/af73627e587c25b9ac6f28a0fda01953252df391#diff-f068c801ccb40fad40c0436ff1e25e3f
.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 03:29 Bernat Gabor wrote:
> Fair enough :+1: Let's go ahead with this then.
>
> > For tools (such as pip) where 2a and 2b behave
Fair enough :+1: Let's go ahead with this then.
> For tools (such as pip) where 2a and 2b behave differently, yes it would. But
> that's a pip implementation decision which can be made independently of the
> resolution of this discussion (the PEP allows either behaviour). The details
> of
Sorry to bump into this so late, but:
Would not 2a be more backward compatible than 2b? I mean people may
have build environments/installs doing:
- pip install setuptools-scm setuptools pbr
- pip install os-system-level
This way you can bypass the setup requires of setuptools to use
