On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 10 June 2013 17:34, holger krekel wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:35 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >> On 10 June 2013 06:04, Alex Clark wrote:
> >> > Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> So yes. I broke Download counts
On 10 June 2013 17:34, holger krekel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:35 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On 10 June 2013 06:04, Alex Clark wrote:
>> > Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
>> >
>> >> So yes. I broke Download counts because they were not more important than
>> >> people being able to
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:35 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 10 June 2013 06:04, Alex Clark wrote:
> > Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
> >
> >> So yes. I broke Download counts because they were not more important than
> >> people being able to actually use PyPI to install from.
> >
> >
> > FWIW
On 10 June 2013 06:04, Alex Clark wrote:
> Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
>
>> So yes. I broke Download counts because they were not more important than
>> people being able to actually use PyPI to install from.
>
>
> FWIW:
>
>
> You missed the moral of the story: when you make a decision like
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> So yes. I broke Download counts because they were not more important than
> people being able to actually use PyPI to install from.
I approve of this message.
//Lennart
___
Distutils-SIG maillist
On Jun 9, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Alex Clark wrote:
> Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
>
>> So yes. I broke Download counts because they were not more important than
>> people being able to actually use PyPI to install from.
>
>
> FWIW:
>
>
> You missed the moral of the story: when you make a de
Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
> So yes. I broke Download counts because they were not more important than
> people being able to actually use PyPI to install from.
FWIW:
You missed the moral of the story: when you make a decision like this,
someone will *always* disagree with you (even ov
On Jun 9, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Alex Clark wrote:
>
> But: this happens all the time in open source communities, even
> mature ones. Someone volunteers to perform some complex task and
> hand-waves-away some requirement they don't personally feel is important
> under the "too hard" or "I don't have t
On Jun 9, 2013, at 9:20 AM, holger krekel wrote:
>> There
>> are many CDN providers out there and I suspect so far only Fastly was
>> contacted. The primary responsibility of that coordinator is correctly
>> sending the message for CDN provider that PyPI is a public exhibition of
>> their service
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 01:57 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 30, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:27 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> >
> > Hi Donald,
> >
> > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 20:08 -
anatoly techtonik gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> I'd say that not getting access to download stats from the start is a fail
on the side of PSF or whoever involved in coordination with Fastly. There
are many CDN providers out there and I suspect so far only Fastly was
contacted. The primary responsibil
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:27 AM, holger krekel wrote:
>
> Hi Donald,
>
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 20:08 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> As you have have noticed the download co
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Fastly has given us access to their streaming log support.
>
> Infrastructure will be setting up a secure method for receiving these logs
> at which point PyPI can use them.
Excellent! Awesomeness unfolds like a FantomenK beat!
//Lennart
__
On May 30, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:27 AM, holger krekel wrote:
>> Hi Donald,
>>
>> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 20:08 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> As you have have noticed the download counts on PyPI are no longer
>>> updating. Originally
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:08:35PM -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As you have have noticed the download counts on PyPI are no longer updating.
> Originally this was due to an issue with the script that processes these
> download counts. However I have now removed the download counts fr
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:27 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> Hi Donald,
>
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 20:08 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> As you have have noticed the download counts on PyPI are no longer updating.
>> Originally this was due to an issue with the script that processes these
Hi,
anatoly techtonik gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Donald Stufft stufft.io> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>
> As you have have noticed the download counts on PyPI are no longer
updating. Originally this was due to an issue with the script that processes
these download count
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As you have have noticed the download counts on PyPI are no longer
> updating. Originally this was due to an issue with the script that
> processes these download counts. However I have now removed the download
> counts from the P
I'll also be at EP and can help to explain how Nix could solve the
isolation problem.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:46 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:36 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> > Hi Holger,
> >
> > holger krekel writes:
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at
Hi Florian,
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:36 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> holger krekel writes:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 17:41 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> >> > Not having download counts maybe lets us think harder a
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 13:39 +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:59 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> > Another more practical data point would be "does this package even
> > install on win32/linux/osx py26/py27/py33" and even better, do its automated
> > tests pass?
>
> Those are
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:59 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> Another more practical data point would be "does this package even
> install on win32/linux/osx py26/py27/py33" and even better, do its automated
> tests pass?
Those are interesting metrics, but doesn't indicate the packages
popularity at al
On May 27, 2013, at 12:27 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> Hi Donald,
>
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 20:08 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> As you have have noticed the download counts on PyPI are no longer updating.
>> Originally this was due to an issue with the script that processes these
Hi Holger,
holger krekel writes:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 17:41 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, holger krekel wrote:
>> > Not having download counts maybe lets us think harder about
>> > better metrics. The number of projects using a package as a dep
>> > might
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 17:41 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> > Not having download counts maybe lets us think harder about
> > better metrics. The number of projects using a package as a dep
> > might be one.
>
> With the current downside bei
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> Not having download counts maybe lets us think harder about
> better metrics. The number of projects using a package as a dep
> might be one.
With the current downside being that it's hard for PyPI to figure out
that number, too :)
Agreed
Hi Donald,
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 20:08 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As you have have noticed the download counts on PyPI are no longer updating.
> Originally this was due to an issue with the script that processes these
> download counts. However I have now removed the download co
27 matches
Mail list logo
